【24h】

Professors deliberation

机译:教授审议

获取原文

摘要

@@It was an invention that came out of necessity. In the sociological seventies decisions taken by the faculty (professors only) were considered to be ‘mandarin policies’ or conspiracies against the will of students and staff. At that time, plenary discussion and ‘democratic voting’ (whatever that means) were seen as the only way forward for the university. Such ideas were not just a transient experiment for fun; they were meant to be serious. In practice however they led to stagnation, mediocrity and lack of responsiveness and flexibility in Dutch universities. Several leading scientists left out of frustration and even more importantly high-level people were no longer interested in a university career. At Delft University such diseases arrived later than elsewhere, but it also took longer to cure them. In my opinion the effects of the bad times in the seventies and eighties are still felt today. The professors deliberation at Industrial Design Engineering was an informal meeting of the faculty at somebody's private home. Initially it offered the opportunity to discuss issues in an atmosphere without the demagogy and politicking of the plenary meetings. It was an effort to maintain at least some academic level.
机译:@@是出于必要而发明的。在七十年代的社会学研究中,教师(仅教授)做出的决定被认为是“国语政策”或违反学生和教职员意愿的阴谋。当时,全体讨论和“民主投票”(无论这意味着什么)被认为是大学前进的唯一途径。这样的想法不只是为了娱乐而进行的短暂实验。他们本来是认真的。但是实际上,它们导致荷兰大学陷入停滞,平庸,缺乏响应能力和灵活性。几位领先的科学家没有沮丧,更重要的是,高层人士对大学生涯不再感兴趣。在代尔夫特大学,这种疾病的发生时间比其他地方晚,但是治愈它们所花费的时间也更长。我认为,今天仍然感受到七十年代和八十年代的不景气的影响。工业设计工程系的教授审议是该教师在某人的私人住宅举行的非正式会议。最初,它提供了一个在不引起全体会议混乱和政治化的气氛中讨论问题的机会。这是努力保持至少一定学术水平的努力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号