【24h】

A stress-dilatancy relation for cemented sands

机译:水泥砂的应力-剪胀关系

获取原文

摘要

In numerical modeling of uncemented soils, Rowe's stress-dilatancy relation for frictional materials was widely used and supported by a large body of experimental results. Even though the derivation of the theory was questioned because the principle of minimum energy no longer applies when friction is involved, De Josselin de Jong (1976) did prove, with an alternative approach based on the laws of friction, that Rowe's final conclusions and his stress-dilatancy relation were valid. Besides frictional materials, Rowe (1962) also proposed a stress-dilatancy relation for cohesive-frictional materials. Recently, researchers applied this relation for cemented sands. Although the Rowe's relation for frictional materials was proved to be correct, the validity of his stress-dilatancy relation for cohesive-frictional materials was never checked. This must be done before the application of that relation to model cohesive-frictional materials. This paper will show that the Rowe's stress-dilatancy relation for cohesive-frictional materials is not correct. A correct stress-dilatancy relation for cemented sands will be proposed, which was derived using the friction laws used by De Josselin de Jong (1976).
机译:在非水泥土的数值模拟中,Rowe摩擦材料的应力-剪胀关系得到了广泛的使用,并得到了大量的实验结果的支持。尽管该理论的推论受到了质疑,因为当涉及到摩擦时,最小能量原理不再适用,但De Josselin de Jong(1976)确实根据摩擦定律用另一种方法证明了Rowe的最终结论和他的结论。应力-剪胀关系有效。除了摩擦材料,Rowe(1962)还提出了粘性摩擦材料的应力-剪胀关系。最近,研究人员将这种关系应用于胶结砂。尽管证明了Rowe与摩擦材料的关系是正确的,但从未检验其对摩擦摩擦材料的应力-剪胀关系的有效性。必须在将这种关系应用于模型内聚摩擦材料之前完成此操作。本文将证明粘性摩擦材料的Rowe应力-剪胀关系是不正确的。将提出正确的胶结砂土应力-剪胀关系,该关系是根据De Josselin de Jong(1976)使用的摩擦定律得出的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号