首页> 外文会议>Communications (MICC), 2009 >LTF-based vs. pilot-based MIMO-OFDM Channel Estimation algorithms: An experimental study in 5.2 GHz wireless channel
【24h】

LTF-based vs. pilot-based MIMO-OFDM Channel Estimation algorithms: An experimental study in 5.2 GHz wireless channel

机译:基于LTF与基于导频的MIMO-OFDM信道估计算法:在5.2 GHz无线信道中进行的实验研究

获取原文

摘要

This paper outlines two classes of channel estimation (CE) techniques, namely the long training field (LTF)-based CE as well as the pilot-based CE. Both LTF and pilot patterns are taken from the 802.11n Draft 2.0 standard. The performance of these two CE classes is evaluated with the aid of actual captured data, provided by experiments under two different propagation scenarios. The first scenario represents the slow time-varying channels, which involve line-of-sight (LOS) outdoor transmission over a distance of 7.5 km. By contrast, the second case corresponds to a Non-LOS indoor environment, where the transmitter and receiver are approximately 15 meters apart, and located in different rooms. Our experimental study shows that the LTF-based CE outperforms the pilot-based CE for slow time-varying outdoor LOS channels, while for indoor NLOS channels, it fails completely. On the other hand, pilot-based CE works in both test cases. Unfortunately, this method is very sensitive to timing synchronization.
机译:本文概述了两类信道估计(CE)技术,即基于长训练场(LTF)的CE和基于飞行员的CE。 LTF和引导模式均来自802.11n Draft 2.0标准。这两种CE类的性能是通过实际捕获的数据进行评估的,这些数据是在两种不同传播场景下通过实验提供的。第一种情况表示慢时变信道,涉及7.5公里距离上的视线(LOS)室外传输。相比之下,第二种情况对应于非LOS室内环境,其中发射器和接收器大约相距15米,并且位于不同的房间中。我们的实验研究表明,基于LTF的CE在慢速时变的室外LOS信道方面优于基于飞行员的CE,而对于室内NLOS信道,则完全失效。另一方面,基于飞行员的CE可以在两个测试用例中使用。不幸的是,这种方法对定时同步非常敏感。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号