首页> 外文会议>ASME turbo expo >HIGH EFFICIENCY GAS TURBINE BASED POWER CYCLES - A STUDY OF THE MOST PROMISING SOLUTIONS: PART 2 - A PARAMETRIC PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
【24h】

HIGH EFFICIENCY GAS TURBINE BASED POWER CYCLES - A STUDY OF THE MOST PROMISING SOLUTIONS: PART 2 - A PARAMETRIC PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

机译:基于高效燃气轮机的功率循环-最可行的解决方案研究:第2部分-参数性能评估

获取原文

摘要

In general, two approaches have been used in the gas turbine industry to improve Brayton cycle performance. One approach includes increasing Turbine Inlet Temperature (TIT) and cycle pressure ratio (β), but it is quite capital intensive requiring extensive research and development work, advancements in cooling (of turbine blades and hot gas path components) technologies, high temperature materials and NOx reducing methods. The second approach involves modifying the Brayton cycle. However, this approach did not become very popular because of the development of high efficiency gas turbine (GT) based combined cycle systems in spite of their high initial cost.This paper discusses another approach that has gained lot of momentum in recent years in which modified Brayton cycles are used with humidification or water/steam injection, termed "wet Cycles", resulting in lower cost/kW power system, or with fuel cells, obtaining " hybrid Cycles"; the cycle efficiency can be comparable with a corresponding combined cycle system including better part-load operational characteristics. Such systems, that include advanced Steam Injected cycle and its variants (STIG, ISTIG, etc.), Recuperated Water Injection cycle (RWI), humidified air turbine cycle (HAT) and Cascaded Humidified Advanced Turbine (CHAT) cycle, Brayton cycle with high temperature fuel cell, Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell (MSFC) or Solid Oxide Fuel Cells (SOFC) and combinationsof these with the modified Brayton cycles, have not yet become commercially available as more development work is required. The main objective of this paper is to provide a detailed parametric thermodynamic cycle analysis of the above mentioned cycles and discussion of their comparative performance including advantages and limitations.
机译:通常,在燃气轮机行业中已经使用两种方法来改善布雷顿循环性能。一种方法包括增加涡轮机入口温度(TIT)和循环压力比(β),但它是一项资本密集型工作,需要大量的研究和开发工作,冷却(涡轮机叶片和热气路径部件)技术的进步,高温材料和减少NOx的方法。第二种方法涉及修改布雷顿循环。但是,由于基于高效燃气轮机(GT)的联合循环系统的发展,尽管这种方法的初始成本很高,但这种方法并未变得很流行。 本文讨论了另一种在近几年中获得发展势头的方法,其中将改良的布雷顿循环与加湿或水/蒸汽注入一起使用,称为“湿循环”,从而降低了成本/ kW的电力系统或燃料电池,从而获得了成功。 “混合循环”;循环效率可以与相应的联合循环系统相媲美,后者包括更好的部分负荷运行特性。这样的系统包括先进的蒸汽喷射循环及其变体(STIG,ISTIG等),回水喷射循环(RWI),加湿空气涡轮循环(HAT)和级联加湿高级涡轮(CHAT)循环,高布雷顿循环温度燃料电池,熔融碳酸盐燃料电池(MSFC)或固体氧化物燃料电池(SOFC)及其组合 这些具有改进的布雷顿循环的装置,由于需要更多的开发工作,因此尚未在市场上出售。本文的主要目的是提供上述循环的详细参数热力学循环分析,并讨论它们的比较性能,包括优点和局限性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号