首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Building Energy and Environment >Experimental Research and Numerical Simulation of Airflow Performance in Level-3 Biosafety Laboratory
【24h】

Experimental Research and Numerical Simulation of Airflow Performance in Level-3 Biosafety Laboratory

机译:三级生物安全实验室气流性能的实验研究与数值模拟

获取原文

摘要

The paper used airflow modeling and particle-tracking methodologies to compare the air performance in Level-3 Biosafety Laboratory for two different air distribution types.Both air change rates were 20 ACH,and the air was supplied by HEPA supply units in the ceiling.But the position of exhaust grilles was different.One was in the ceiling,and the other was on the wall at low level (0.1m above the floor).Combining the experimental measurements and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations,the recovery time,age of air,ventilation efficiency,air change efficiency and contaminant removal efficiency were worked out in the two air distribution types.Based on the experimental and numerical simulation data,it can be concluded that the cleanliness level and the recovery time are not different in the two exhaust types.In addition,the age of air and air exchange efficiency are better when using an up exhaust mode.However,it's more effective when the down exhaust is used to remove the indoor contaminative particles.Moreover,the larger diameter particles remain a longer time in the up exhaust mode.
机译:本文使用气流建模和粒子跟踪方法对Level-3生物安全实验室中两种不同空气分配类型的空气性能进行了比较。两种空气变化率均为20 ACH,空气由天花板上的HEPA供应单元供应。排气格栅的位置不同。一个在天花板上,另一个在地板上低层(距地面0.1m)。结合实验测量结果和计算流体力学(CFD)模拟,确定了恢复时间,寿命计算了两种空气分配类型的空气,通风效率,换气效率和污染物去除效率。基于实验和数值模拟数据,可以得出结论,两种空气的清洁度和恢复时间没有区别此外,使用上排气模式时,空气的寿命和空气交换效率会更好。但是,当使用下排气来去除室内空气时,效率会更高。此外,直径较大的颗粒在向上排气模式下保持更长的时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号