首页> 外文会议>World environmental and water resources congress >Evaluation of Floating Wetland Islands as a Retrofit to Existing Stormwater Detention Basins
【24h】

Evaluation of Floating Wetland Islands as a Retrofit to Existing Stormwater Detention Basins

机译:浮动湿地岛作为现有雨水拘留盆地改造的评价

获取原文

摘要

Since the passage of the Clean Water Act, wet detention ponds have been installed across the United States primarily for peak flow mitigation and sediment reduction. However, there are surprisingly minimal data on water quality benefits of these systems. Additionally, tremendous retrofitting pressure is likely to accompany state of North Carolina-implemented watershed rules associated with the Jordan Lake and Fall Lake reservoirs. Municipalities in these watersheds will be required to meet nutrient load reduction targets, necessitating urban stormwater practice retrofits for existing development. Therefore, it is imperative for many cities in central North Carolina to identify cost effective retrofits. One potential retrofit, floating wetland islands, is particularly attractive because they (1) do not require earth moving, (2) eliminate the need for additional land to be dedicated to treatment, and (3) will not detract from the required storage volume required for wet ponds (because they float). Two wet ponds in Durham, NC, were retrofitted with floating wetland islands. Prior to retrofit, both ponds had little to no vegetation growing inside them. After retrofit, one pond's surface area was comprised of 8% floating wetland islands and the second pond had 19% coverage. The two ponds were monitored in a non-retrofitted state from November 2008 to March 2010. Floating wetland islands were then installed in March-April 2010. After vegetation had established on the islands, monitoring recommenced in July 2010. Area-velocity meters and Manning's equation were used to take flow-proportional, composite water quality samples. Sixteen water quality samples were taken prior to the floating island retrofit, and twelve have been collected thus far post-retrofit. Initial results show that mean effluent concentrations of total nitrogen (TN) were reduced at one pond from 1.05 mg/L to 0.61 mg/L from pre- to post-retrofit. The other pond had relatively low effluent concentrations (0.41 mg/L and 0.43 mg/L) both pre- and post- retrofit. Mean TP effluent concentrations were reduced at both wet ponds from pre- to post-retrofit (0.17 mg/L to 0.12 mg/L and 0.11 mg/L to 0.05 mg/L. Additionally, TSS effluent concentrations at both ponds were modestly lower post-retrofit, presumably due to additional hydraulic resistance provided by the floating islands and their hanging roots, which have been measured to be approximately 0.6 m (2 ft). Initial results show some modest nutrient and sediment removal benefits from the addition of floating islands to stormwater detention ponds. Additional benefits which will be determined in the future include wetland vegetation root mass and potential improvements in benthic macroinvertebrate habitat.
机译:由于清洁水法案的通过,湿拘留池塘已被安装在美国主要用于峰流速减缓和减沙。不过,也有对这些系统的水质效益出奇的最小数据。此外,巨大的改造压力很可能伴随着与乔丹有关的湖北卡罗莱纳州实施流域规则状态和秋季湖水库。在这些流域各市须符合营养负荷削减目标,迫使城市雨水实践改造现有的发展。因此,当务之急是在北卡罗来纳州中部的许多城市,以确定成本效益的改造。一个潜在的改型,浮动湿岛屿,是特别有吸引力的,因为它们(1)不需要运土,(2)消除了对额外的土地需要专用于治疗,和(3)将不会减损所需的存储量要求湿池塘(因为它们浮动)。在北卡罗来纳州达勒姆的两个湿池塘,用浮动湿地的岛屿改装。改造前,这两个池塘小得没有植被里面他们成长。改造后,一个池塘的表面面积由8%浮动湿地岛屿和第二个水塘有19%的覆盖率。两个池塘在非改装的状态进行监测,从2008年11月至2010年3月浮动湿地岛屿,然后安装在2010年三月至四月植被曾在岛上设立,在七月重新开始监测2010年区,速度计和后曼宁方程被用于采取流量比例,复合水质样品。十六个水质样品进行的浮岛改造之前采取的,和十二迄今已收集,改造后。初步结果显示总氮(TN)的该平均流出物的浓度在一个池塘从1.05毫克/升,从之前到之后的改型被减少到0.61毫克/升。其他池塘具有相对低的流出物的浓度(0.41 mg / L和0.43毫克/升)前和后的改型。平均数TP流出物浓度分别固定在从之前到之后的改型都湿池塘减少(0.17毫克/升,以0.12毫克/升和0.11毫克/升,以0.05毫克/升。此外,TSS出水浓度在两个池塘是适度低交-retrofit,大概是由于由浮动岛屿及其悬挂根,其中已经测量提供额外的液压阻力为约0.6米(2英尺)。初步结果显示一些适度的营养物和沉淀物去除益处从加法浮岛到的雨水滞留池。这将在将来被确定的其他好处包括湿地植被根质量和底栖动物栖息地潜在的改进。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号