首页> 外文会议>USSD(United States Society on Dams) Annual Conference >CARTER LAKE INTAKE TOWER DESIGN: COMPARING AND CONTRASTING DESIGN METHODS
【24h】

CARTER LAKE INTAKE TOWER DESIGN: COMPARING AND CONTRASTING DESIGN METHODS

机译:卡特湖进水塔设计:比较和对比设计方法

获取原文

摘要

In the process of designing the intake tower for the Carter Lake Dam No. 1 Outlet Works Addition, URS performed an extensive review of intake tower design guidelines and discovered two different design philosophies for seismic design of intake towers-load factor design (as published by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers) and working stress design. The review revealed that the two design approaches employ nearly identical methods for developing applied loads on the structures to determine the shear and moment in cross-sections of the tower; however, the two approaches employ different methods to evaluate the nominal strength and stability of the structure. For example, load factor design prescribes large reductions to the applied forces relative to the increase in allowable stresses prescribed by the working stress approach for the earthquake loading conditions. As a result of the differences between the two approaches, the design of the intake tower for the Carter Lake Dam No. 1 varies considerably depending on the approach used. This paper compares and contrasts the two design approaches considered in the design of the intake tower and presents the tower designs resulting from application of the two different methods. This paper also presents a discussion on the differences between the two approaches to moment design and stability evaluation. Specific attention is given to the methods for evaluating the stability of an intake tower.
机译:在为卡特湖大坝1号出口工程附加工程设计进水塔的过程中,URS对进水塔的设计准则进行了广泛的审查,并发现了进水塔抗震设计的两种不同的设计理念-荷载因数设计(由美国陆军工程兵团)和工作压力设​​计。审查显示,这两种设计方法采用几乎相同的方法在结构上产生施加的载荷,以确定塔架横截面的剪切力和弯矩。但是,这两种方法采用不同的方法来评估结构的标称强度和稳定性。例如,相对于地震荷载工况下的工作应力方法所规定的允许应力的增加,载荷系数设计规定了施加力的大幅减小。由于两种方法之间的差异,卡特湖大坝1号进水塔的设计根据所使用的方法而有很大不同。本文对进气塔设计中考虑的两种设计方法进行了比较和对比,并介绍了两种不同方法的应用所产生的塔架设计。本文还讨论了力矩设计和稳定性评估这两种方法之间的差异。特别注意评估进气塔稳定性的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号