首页> 外文会议>AWMA's (Air Waste Management Association) annual conference exhibition >An Unbiased Look at the New National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for Particulate Matter
【24h】

An Unbiased Look at the New National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for Particulate Matter

机译:公正地了解新的国家环境空气质量标准(NAAQS)

获取原文

摘要

On September 21, 2006, the United Stated Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) revised theNational Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for both fine and inhalable particulate matter.The EPA lowered the 24-hour standard for fine particulate matter, consisting of particles that are2.5 microns or smaller (PM2.5), from 65 micrograms per cubic meter (μg/m~3) to 35 μg/m~3, andretained the current annual fine particle standard of 15 μg/m~3. The EPA decided to retain theexisting 24-hour standard of 150 μg/m~3 for coarse particulate matter, those particles equal to orless than 10 microns (PM10). Stating a lack of evidence linking health problems to long-termexposure to coarse particle pollution, the EPA revoked the annual PM10 standard.According to the EPA, the agency evaluated thousands of peer-reviewed scientific studies aboutthe effects of particle pollution on public health and welfare prior to selecting these specificstandards. The process included public hearings and written comment periods. The EPAsubjected its science and policy review documents to external scientific review. However, thedecision has disappointed the environmental, medical, and scientific communities. Manyenvironmental watch dog groups and environmental professionals supported lower standards,claiming recent health studies support their positions.But who's right? This paper presents an unbiased look at the revised NAAQS.
机译:2006年9月21日,美国环境保护署(EPA)修改了 细颗粒物和可吸入颗粒物的国家环境空气质量标准(NAAQS)。 EPA降低了细颗粒物的24小时标准,细颗粒物包括 2.5微米或更小(PM2.5),从每立方米65微克(μg/ m〜3)到35μg/ m〜3,以及 保留了目前的年度细颗粒标准15μg/ m〜3。 EPA决定保留 现有的24小时标准,即粗颗粒物的浓度为150μg/ m〜3,等于或等于 小于10微米(PM10)。说明缺乏将健康问题与长期疾病联系起来的证据 由于暴露于粗颗粒污染,EPA取消了年度PM10标准。 根据EPA的说法,该机构评估了数千篇经过同行评审的科学研究 在选择这些特定污染物之前,颗粒污染对公共健康和福利的影响 标准。该过程包括公开听证会和书面评论期。环保局 对其科学和政策审查文件进行外部科学审查。但是,那 这一决定使环境,医学和科学界感到失望。许多 环保看门狗团体和环保专业人员支持较低的标准, 声称最近的健康研究支持他们的立场。 但是谁是对的?本文对修订后的NAAQS进行了公正的介绍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号