首页> 外文会议>SPE Asia Pacific oil gas conference and exhibition >Sibling Rivalry: Competitive Tendering vs. Direct Selection – A Debate of SuitableProcurement Method on the Achievement of Supply Chain Objective in the Oil andGas Operator Industry
【24h】

Sibling Rivalry: Competitive Tendering vs. Direct Selection – A Debate of SuitableProcurement Method on the Achievement of Supply Chain Objective in the Oil andGas Operator Industry

机译:同级竞争:竞争性招标与直接选择–油气运营商行业中实现供应链目标的适当采购方法之争

获取原文

摘要

Competitive Tendering (read: Call-for-Tender) and DirectSelection (abbrv. DS) are kinds of procurement method thatshould provide oil and gas operator with sound quality serviceand materials (read: goods), timely deliverance, competitiveprice, and high service quality for the exploration, production,and health-safety-environment. In fact, both rarely go hand-inhandin contributing such objectives. That makes the “SiblingRivalry” term is represented in this paper.In this paper, the author uses a deductive analysisusing pilot project of these methods by a major operator,benchmarking, and survey of the distribution network willshow data as the impact on the application of particularmethod. The scope’s limitation set along with parameter ofCenter for Advance and Purchasing Studies, research only onthe upstream level of the industry, and the exclusion ofspecific regulation of a particular country. The conclusion ofwhether certain method more suitable for a particular situationwould finally be presented.
机译:竞争性招标(请阅读:招标书)和直接招标 选择(缩写DS)是一种采购方法, 应为石油和天然气经营者提供优质的服务 和材料(阅读:货物),及时交付,具有竞争力 价格,高品质的勘探,生产, 和健康安全环境。实际上,两者很少并驾齐驱 为实现这些目标而努力。这使得“兄弟姐妹” 本文以“竞争”一词为代表。 在本文中,作者使用了演绎分析 由主要运营商使用这些方法的试点项目, 进行基准测试,并对分销网络进行调查 显示数据对特定应用程序的影响 方法。范围限制设置以及参数 进修与购买研究中心,仅针对以下方面进行研究 行业的上游水平,并排除 特定国家/地区的特定法规。结论 某些方法是否更适合于特定情况 最终将被提出。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号