首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies >Best Practice for Transitioning from Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Enhanced Oil Recovery EOR to CO2 Storage
【24h】

Best Practice for Transitioning from Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Enhanced Oil Recovery EOR to CO2 Storage

机译:从二氧化碳(CO2)增强的储存EOR转换到CO2储存的最佳实践

获取原文

摘要

The purpose of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) is to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere as a climate change mitigation activity. However, given the relatively high costs currently associated with CCS, coupling CCS with Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) could provide a critical financial incentive to facilitate development of CCS projects in the near term. One issue is that projects to enhance oil production are primarily implemented to increase oil production with (tertiary recovery methods and any long term storage of CO2 is considered a potential ancillary benefit. When projects are designed as CCS from the start, there is typically a site evaluation process to review the storage formation according to best practice criteria for CCS. In EOR, the formation where CO2 would be stored is predetermined by the existing oil bearing reservoir, raising potential questions about monitoring, long-term CO2 storage liabilities, potential, leakage, permanence and other issues that must be addressed in CCS projects but may fall outside the boundaries of a typical EOR project. Finally, although this paper is premised on historical and current experiences with enhanced oil recovery projects, similar considerations could also be given to enhanced recovery of natural gas. There are no specific technological barriers or challenges in transitioning and converting a pure CO2-EOR operation into a CO2 storage operation but there are a number of legal, regulatory and economic differences which must be addressed if an EOR project is to serve as a CCS project. Lack of experience or unresolved issues related to EOR becoming CCS could create barriers unless the issues are fully understood and managed to the satisfaction of regulators. Understanding best practice and the policy and regulatory frameworks affecting CCS from EOR is an important driver for ensuring that CO2-EOR projects are developed in a manner which will enable the carbon stored to be recognised as a mitigation activity under local legislation/carbon market schemes and in national GHG inventories which support monitoring progress under the COP21 Paris Agreement. The paper provides an overview of the key issues in the USA, Canada, EU, Australia, and Brazil and provides recommendations for what companies need to do should they wish to transition from EOR to CCS for existing or future operations.
机译:碳捕获和储存(CCS)的目的是减少温室气体排放到大气中的气候变化减缓活性。然而,鉴于目前与CCS相关的成本相对较高,耦合与提高石油采收率(EOR)CCS可以提供​​关键性的财政刺激,以促进CCS项目的发展在短期内。一个问题是,项目,加强石油生产主要是落实增加成品油产量与(三次采油方法和CO2的任何长期存储被认为是一个潜在的附带的好处,当项目的设计从一开始就CCS,通常存在网站评估过程以根据最佳实践标准CCS审查存储的形成。在EOR,其中CO 2将被存储是通过现有的石油储层预定的​​形成,提高对监测潜在的问题,长期储存二氧化碳负债,电位器,泄漏,持久性和必须在CCS项目虽然本文是关于与提高石油采收率项目的历史和当前的经验为前提来解决,但可能属于典型的EOR项目的边界之外。最后,其他的问题,类似的考虑也给予增强天然气的复苏,我们在转变和合作没有具体的技术障碍和挑战nverting纯CO2-EOR操作成CO2存储操作,但也有一些,如果一个EOR项目是作为一个CCS项目必须解决的法律,法规和经济差异。缺乏经验或与之相关的EOR成为CCS可能产生的障碍,除非问题得到充分的理解和管理,以民航当局满意的悬而未决的问题。了解最佳实践和政策,并影响从EOR CCS监管框架是确保CO2-EOR项目的方式,这将使存储被认为是按照当地法律/碳市场计划和缓解活动中的碳发展的重要驱动力其中支持COP21巴黎协定下监测进展情况国家温室气体清单。本文提供了在美国,加拿大,欧盟,澳大利亚,巴西等关键问题进行了概述,并提供了什么样的公司需要做的,他们应该想从过渡到EOR CCS对现有或未来的运作提供建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号