首页> 外文会议>SPE/IADC drilling conference >Modeling of ECD in Casing Drilling Operations and Comparison with Experimental andField Data
【24h】

Modeling of ECD in Casing Drilling Operations and Comparison with Experimental andField Data

机译:套管钻井作业中的ECD建模以及与实验数据和现场数据的比较

获取原文

摘要

Three modeling approaches to the determination ofequivalent circulating density (ECD) in Casing Drilling1operations are considered in this study; viz., hook-loadmeasurements, pump-pressure measurements andconventional hydraulic models. The bottom-hole pressure isobtained by adding the calculated annular pressure losses tothe hydrostatic pressure. Since the annular clearance is verysmall in casing drilling, a narrow-slot flow approximationmodel is adopted that takes into account the effect of piperotation. A Yield-Power-Law (YPL) drilling fluid isconsidered in this study.Results from each of the three approaches are comparedwith experimental and field data. The differences between thecalculated and measured bottom-hole pressures (hence ECD)are within a range of about ±8%. In terms of the frictionalpressure losses in the annulus, this range increases to about±60% in some instances.It is shown that pipe rotation plays an important role indetermining ECD. The experimental data indicate an increasein the annular pressure losses with increasing pipe rotaryspeed. The hook-load measurements correlate well withflowing bottom-hole pressures.
机译:确定的三种建模方法 套管钻井中的等效循环密度(ECD) 1个 在这项研究中考虑了手术;即钩挂 测量,泵压力测量和 常规液压模型。井底压力为 通过将计算出的环形压力损失与 静水压力。由于环形间隙非常大 套管钻井较小,狭缝流量近似 采用考虑管道影响的模型 回转。屈服动力法(YPL)钻井液为 在这项研究中考虑过。 比较三种方法中每种方法的结果 实验和现场数据。两者之间的区别 计算和测量的井底压力(因此称为ECD) 在大约±8%的范围内。在摩擦方面 环空的压力损失,这个范围增加到大约 在某些情况下为±60%。 结果表明,管道旋转在 确定ECD。实验数据表明 在环形压力损失中,随着管道旋转的增加 速度。吊钩载荷测量值与 井底流动压力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号