首页> 外文会议>Acid Rain 2000 >DOES ACIDIFICATION POLICY FOLLOW RESEARCH IN NORTHERN SWEDEN? THE CASE OF NATURAL ACIDITY DURING THE 1990'S
【24h】

DOES ACIDIFICATION POLICY FOLLOW RESEARCH IN NORTHERN SWEDEN? THE CASE OF NATURAL ACIDITY DURING THE 1990'S

机译:瑞典北部的酸化政策是否遵循研究? 1990年代自然酸的情况

获取原文

摘要

The situation in northern Sweden did not figure prominently in the intense period of research during the 1980's that laid the basis for many acidification-related policies now in effect in Europe and Sweden. Northern Sweden has not only relatively low acid deposition levels and significant sources of natural acidity, but also intense episodes of pH decline during spring flood that are a major focus of liming activity. Controversy over that liming and natural acidity has led to scientific advances. These include discovery of a correlation between sulfur in snow and the anthropogenic contribution to the subsequent spring flood ANC decline, but also that natural organic acidity is responsible for most of the spring pH decline in the region. This paper compares the developments in liming policy with the scientific developments of relevance to the region during the last decade. Considerable discrepancies are noted which create opportunities for revising remediation policies to better reflect the state of knowledge in 2000.
机译:在1980年代的密集研究期间,瑞典北部的局势并未显着突出,这为目前在欧洲和瑞典生效的许多与酸化有关的政策奠定了基础。瑞典北部不仅有相对较低的酸沉积水平和重要的天然酸度来源,而且在春季洪水期间pH值急剧下降,这是石灰活动的主要重点。关于石灰和天然酸度的争议导致了科学的进步。其中包括发现雪中的硫与人为因素对随后的春季洪水ANC下降的相关性,而且还发现天然有机酸度是该地区大部分春季pH下降的原因。本文将限制政策的发展与过去十年与该地区相关的科学发展进行了比较。注意到差异很大,这为修订补救政策提供了机会,以更好地反映2000年的知识状况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号