首页> 外文会议>POWER-GEN international conference >ROUTINE MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, AND REPLACEMENT:A REVIEW OF RECENT COURT DECISIONS
【24h】

ROUTINE MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, AND REPLACEMENT:A REVIEW OF RECENT COURT DECISIONS

机译:日常维护,修复和更换:最近法院判决的审查

获取原文

摘要

Where is the line between routine maintenance and a modification that requires a permit? Whatare the criteria for determining routine? Since the EPA has made non-compliance of NewSource Review (NSR) requirements an enforcement priority, the narrowing of the routinemaintenance exemption is critical to NSR compliance. As such, EPA has closely examined theutility industry, especially coal fired boilers, to determine if some repairs of these units wouldnot be considered routine and should theoretically trigger Prevention of Significant Deterioration(PSD) or New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) requirements.Several court cases and EPA guidance memos over the last fifteen years have attempted toclarify the NSR/NSPS exemption for "routine maintenance, repair, and replacement". From theWEPCO decision in 1989 to the Tennessee Valley Authority decision in September 2000, muchhas happened to cloud the use of the routine maintenance, repair and replacement definition.This paper will review these and other decisions and guidance memos and attempt to shed somelight on the evolving definition of "routine".
机译:日常维护和需要许可的修改之间的界限在哪里?什么 确定常规的标准是什么?由于EPA违反了新 来源审查(NSR)要求强制执行优先,并缩小常规范围 免除维护对于遵守NSR至关重要。因此,EPA已仔细检查了 公用事业行业,尤其​​是燃煤锅炉,以确定是否对这些单元进行某些维修 不应视为常规操作,理论上应触发预防严重恶化 (PSD)或新源性能标准(NSPS)要求。 在过去的15年中,一些法院案件和EPA指导备忘录试图 阐明“日常维护,修理和更换”的NSR / NSPS豁免。来自 1989年的WEPCO裁决到2000年9月的田纳西河谷管理局裁决 碰巧云使用了日常维护,维修和更换定义。 本文将回顾这些以及其他决策和指导备忘录,并尝试摆脱一些 根据“例程”的不断发展的定义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号