【24h】

A note on group mutual exclusion

机译:关于群体互斥的注意事项

获取原文

摘要

Group mutual exclusion is a natural problem, formulated by Joung in 1998, that generalises the classical mutual exclusion problem. In group mutual exclusion a process requests a "session" before entering its critical section; processes are allowed to be in the critical section simultaneously provided they have requested the same session. To rule out solutions that cause processes to delay each other even when they all request the same session, group mutual exclusion algorithms must satisfy a property called "concurrent entering". Joung stated this property only informally. Keane and Moir later gave a precise statement of this property and devised a simple group mutual exclusion algorithm that satisfies it.

We argue that Keane and Moir's formulation is not quite as strong as the property Joung described informally. We propose a new precise and simple formulation of concurrent entering that is stronger than Keane and Moir's and properly captures Joung's intention. Keane and Moir's algorithmdoes not satisfy this stronger property, while Joung's original algorithm does. We present another algorithm that satisfies this stronger property and has some advantages over Joung's.

机译:小组互斥是Joung在1998年提出的自然问题,它概括了经典的互斥问题。在小组互斥中,一个过程在进入其关键部分之前请求一个“会话”。如果进程请求了相同的会话,则允许它们同时处于关键部分。为了排除导致进程甚至在它们都请求相同会话时也会彼此延迟的解决方案,组互斥算法必须满足称为“并发进入”的属性。 Joung仅非正式地声明了此财产。随后,Keane和Moir对该属性进行了精确说明,并设计了一个满足该属性的简单组互斥算法。

我们认为,基恩和莫尔的表述不如Joung非正式描述的财产那么强大。我们提出了一种新的精确且简单的并发输入方式,该方式要比Keane和Moir的输入要强,并能恰当地体现Joung的意图。 Keane和Moir的算法不满足此更强的属性,而Joung的原始算法却不满足。我们提出了另一种算法,该算法可以满足此更强的属性,并且比Joung的算法具有一些优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号