首页> 外文会议>SPE annual technical conference and exhibition >A comparison of wireline and drillstem test fluid samples from a deepwater gas-condensate exploration well
【24h】

A comparison of wireline and drillstem test fluid samples from a deepwater gas-condensate exploration well

机译:来自深水凝析气勘探井的电缆和钻杆测试流体样品的比较

获取原文

摘要

Successful sampling of gas-condensates is not straightforward with wireline fluid sampling tools, and ambiguous results are often obtained. As a result well testing has often been regarded as the only method of ensuring representative samples. However, testing is expensive and environmentally unfriendly so to be able to rely on wireline fluid samples would be of great value in exploration and appraisal. Few examples exist where both test and wireline samples have been obtained and compared. In a recent deepwater exploration well offshore Mid-Norway (6305/7-1 Barden) which confirmed the presence of hydrocarbons in the southern extension of the Ormen Lange Dome structure, BP took both wireline and DST samples. This study compares the two sample types and discusses the sampling operations. The drillstem test was justified by the requirement for high quality PVT samples which were needed to give an accurate assessment of the liquid content of the gas. This is critical to determining the processing requirements in a future development of the discovery. The well was drilled in 860m of water and the cold wellbore conditions were considered a key risk to wireline fluid sample quality. The well was drilled with water-based mud and a relatively dry gas (5-30 bbls/mmscf) was expected; the dew point was unknown. The MDT tool was used to take wireline samples using a'low shock' sampling technique (controlled drawdown). The test samples were taken isokinetically from the separator and just upstream of the choke. The two sets of samples show a remarkable similarity in fluid properties, encouraging us to believe we may be able to rely on wireline samples in future wells. The reasons for the success are discussed. This experience demonstrates that, where water based-mud is used, representative fluid samples can be obtained from undersaturated gas-condensate wells using the MDT wireline fluid sampling tool, even in a cold deepwater environment. This experience could enable operators in future to minimise or avoid the need for well testing.
机译:使用电缆流体采样工具无法成功地对气体冷凝物进行成功采样,并且常常会获得不明确的结果。结果,通常将井测试视为确保代表性样品的唯一方法。然而,测试是昂贵的并且对环境不友好,因此能够依靠电缆流体样本在勘探和评估中将具有巨大的价值。很少有例子可以同时获得测试样本和有线样本并进行比较。在最近的中挪威海上深水勘探井(6305 / 7-1巴登)中,证实了在Ormen Lange Dome结构的南部延伸段中存在碳氢化合物,BP进行了有线和DST采样。本研究比较了两种样本类型并讨论了抽样操作。钻杆测试的理由是需要高质量的PVT样品,以准确评估气体中的液体含量。这对于确定发现的未来开发中的处理要求至关重要。该井在860m的水中钻探,寒冷的井眼条件被认为是影响电缆流体样品质量的主要风险。该井钻有水基泥浆,预计会有相对干燥的气体(5-30桶/毫米标准立方英尺)。露点未知。 MDT工具用于通过“低冲击”采样技术(受控压降)采集电缆样本。从分离器等速地从扼流圈上游取测试样品。两组样品在流体性质上显示出显着的相似性,这使我们相信,我们将来可能会依靠电缆样品。讨论成功的原因。这项经验表明,在使用水基泥浆的情况下,即使在寒冷的深水环境中,也可以使用MDT电缆流体采样工具从欠饱和的凝析气井中获得代表性的流体样品。这种经验可以使操作员将来减少或避免对油井测试的需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号