首页> 外文会议>Intersociety energy conversion engineering conference;IECEC >MODELING AND PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF SOME NON-CONVENTIONAL COOLING AND DEHUMIDIFICATION OPTIONS WITH A CONVENTIONAL COOLING COIL SYSTEM
【24h】

MODELING AND PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF SOME NON-CONVENTIONAL COOLING AND DEHUMIDIFICATION OPTIONS WITH A CONVENTIONAL COOLING COIL SYSTEM

机译:常规冷却盘管系统对某些非常规冷却除湿方案的建模和性能比较

获取原文

摘要

The use of a packed-type liquid desiccant absorber (PLDA) or an internally cooled liquid desiccant absorber (ICLDA) for air cooling and dehumidification show some promises over a water cooled cooling coil (WCCC) in terms of coolant temperature requirements and renewable energy applications. The purpose of this paper is to compare the performance of a PLDA, an ICLDA, and a WCCC with each other. For this purpose models to predict the performance of each system are developed and load removal characteristic plots are generated and presented in this work. As a case study, for two different sets of air inlet conditions depicting a high and a low latent and sensible load on each system, their cooling and dehumidification performance is reported as a function of coolant temperature and mass flow rate. Finally, for a given coolant temperature and mass flow rate, it was found that a PLDA and an ICLDA have better latent load removal characteristics while a WCCC showed better sensible load removal characteristics.
机译:在冷却剂温度要求和可再生能源应用方面,使用填充型液体干燥剂吸收器(PLDA)或内部冷却的液体干燥剂吸收器(ICLDA)进行空气冷却和除湿显示出优于水冷冷却盘管(WCCC)的一些前景。本文的目的是比较PLDA,ICLDA和WCCC的性能。为此目的,开发了用于预测每个系统性能的模型,并在此工作中生成并显示了负载去除特性图。作为案例研究,对于两组不同的进气情况(分别表示每个系统的高和低潜伏感负载),报告了它们的冷却和除湿性能是冷却剂温度和质量流量的函数。最后,对于给定的冷却剂温度和质量流量,发现PLDA和ICLDA具有更好的潜在负荷去除特性,而WCCC具有更好的显着负荷去除特性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号