首页> 外文会议>Human Factors and Ergonomics Society annual meeting >A Comparison of the Unpressurized Rover and Small Pressurized Rover During a Desert Field Evaluation
【24h】

A Comparison of the Unpressurized Rover and Small Pressurized Rover During a Desert Field Evaluation

机译:沙漠田地评价中未加压罗孚和小型加压罗孚的比较

获取原文

摘要

To effectively explore the lunar surface, astronauts will need a transportation vehicle which can traverse all types of terrain. Currently, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA) is investigating two lunar rover configurations to meet such a requirement. Under the Lunar Electric Rover (LER) project, a comparison study between the unpressurized rover (UPR) and the small pressurized rover (SPR) was conducted at the Black Point Lava Flow in Arizona. The objective of the study was to obtain human-in-the-loop performance data on the vehicles with respect to human-machine interfaces, vehicle impacts on crew productivity, and scientific observations. Four male participants took part in four, one-day field tests using the exact same terrain and scientific sites for an accurate comparison between vehicle configurations. Subjective data was collected using several human factors performance measures. Results indicate either vehicle configuration was generally acceptable for a lunar mission; however, the SPR configuration was preferred over the UPR configuration priminarly for the SPR's ability to cause less fatigue and enabling greater crew productivity.
机译:为了有效探索月球表面,宇航员将需要一个可以遍历所有类型的地形的运输工具。目前,美国国家航空航天局(NASA)正在调查两个月球流动站配置,以满足此类要求。在月球电火箭(LER)项目下,在亚利桑那州的黑点熔岩流中进行了非压力罗弗(UPR)和小型加压流动站(SPR)之间的比较研究。该研究的目的是获得关于人机界面的车辆内的人载性能数据,车辆对机组生产力和科学观察的影响。四名男性参与者参加了四个一天的现场测试,使用完全相同的地形和科学站点进行准确比较车辆配置。使用几种人类因素绩效措施收集主观数据。结果表明月球任务通常可以接受车辆配置;然而,SPR配置优于UPR构型原料,用于SPR的能力导致疲劳较小并实现更大的机组生产率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号