【24h】

On perfect introspection with quantifying-in

机译:通过量化实现完美的内省

获取原文

摘要

Reasoning about knowledge, once the exclusive arena for philosophical investigation, has in the last two decades become an active field of research in a variety of scientific disciplines. These include artificial intelligence, economics, linguistics, philosophy and theoretical computer science. While the issues arising in the different disciplines share a significant degree of commonality, the separate communities pursued their respective research efforts fairly independently for quite a while. The First conference on Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Knowledge (TARK I) was organized by Joe Halpern in 1986, with the goal of bringing together researchers from these fields to discuss issues of mutual interest. The conference was a great success, and was followed by a second and third conference in 1988 and 1990. The first three TARK conferences have brought the interdisciplinary community attending this conference closer together, a fact that is reflected in a growing body of interdisciplinary research in the field. >We are now holding TARK IV, the fourth biennial conference in the series. The interdisciplinary program committee consisted of Johan van Benthem (University of Amsterdam), Adam Brandenburger (Harvard University), Ronald Fagin (IBM Almaden Research Center), Anil Gupta (Indiana University), Vassos Hadzilacos (University of Toronto), William Harper (University of Western Ontario), David Israel (SRI International), Hector Levesque (University of Toronto), Yoram Moses (Weizmann Institute), Phil Reny (University of Western Ontario), Dov Samet (Tel Aviv University), and Yoav Shoham (Stanford University). The committee carefully considered all of the 70 papers submitted to the conference. At least four and usually six members of the committee read each submitted paper. Only 17 papers were selected for presentation at the conference. (One of the papers was later withdrawn by the author.) Besides ensuring that only papers of very high quality appear in the conference, the committee had to restrict the number of papers in order to allow the conference participants plenty of time for rump sessions and informal discussions. Thus, many good papers had to be rejected. >This volume consists of extended abstracts of those 16 accepted papers, as well as a couple of invited talks and a tutorial to be presented in the conference. Moreover, we added two papers that cover tutorials presented in the 1990 conference and generated a great deal of interest. We believe this volume provides a good interdisciplinary selection of state of the art research on the topic of reasoning about knowledge. Despite the careful job done by the program committee, none of the extended abstracts appearing here was formally refereed, and it is expected that most of them will appear in more polished and complete form in refereed journals. I'd like to thank Karl Shell and Ehud Kalai, the general editors of the Journal of Economic Theory and of Games and Economic Behavior, respectively, for announcing that appearance of abstracts in the TARK IV proceedings will not affect the publication of full length versions of these papers in their journals. This made it easier for economists to submit papers to the conference. I hope that this will be repeated in future conferences as well. >The conference was sponsored and made possible by a grant from the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. Travel grants for students were provided by the American Association for Intelligence. Supplementary funds and administrative support were provided by Cambridge Research Lab and by IBM Almaden Research Center.
机译:关于知识的推理曾经是哲学研究的专有领域,在过去的二十年中,它已经成为各种科学学科中活跃的研究领域。这些包括人工智能,经济学,语言学,哲学和理论计算机科学。尽管不同学科中出现的问题具有很大的共通性,但各个社区在相当长的一段时间内都相当独立地开展了各自的研究工作。乔·哈珀恩(Joe Halpern)于1986年组织了第一次关于知识推理的理论方面的会议(TARK I),其目的是召集这些领域的研究人员讨论共同感兴趣的问题。这次会议取得了巨大的成功,随后在1988年和1990年分别召开了第二次和第三次会议。前三个TARK会议使参加本次会议的跨学科团体更加紧密地联系在一起,这一事实在不断增长的跨学科研究中得到了体现。

我们现在正在举行TARK IV,这是该系列的第四届两年一次的会议。跨学科计划委员会由阿姆斯特丹大学的Johan van Benthem,哈佛大学的Adam Brandenburger,IBM Almaden研究中心的Ronald Fagin,印第安纳大学的Anil Gupta,多伦多大学的Vassos Hadzilacos,威廉·哈珀(大学)组成。西安大略省),大卫·以色列(SRI国际),赫克托·莱维斯克(多伦多大学),约拉姆·摩西(韦兹曼学院),菲尔·雷尼(西安大略大学),多夫·沙美特(特拉维夫大学)和约夫·肖汉姆(斯坦福大学) )。委员会仔细审议了提交会议的所有70篇论文。每个提交的论文至少有四名,通常是六名委员会成员阅读。会议只选择了17篇论文进行介绍。 (其中一篇论文后来被作者撤回。)除了确保只有高质量的论文出现在会议上之外,委员会还必须限制论文的数量,以便使会议参与者有充裕的时间参加下届会议和非正式讨论。因此,许多优秀的论文必须被拒绝。

本卷包括对这16篇被接受的论文的扩展摘要,以及一些邀请的演讲和将在会议上进行介绍的教程。此外,我们添加了两篇论文,这些论文涵盖了1990年会议上介绍的教程,并引起了极大的兴趣。我们认为,本卷为有关知识推理的主题的最新研究提供了很好的跨学科选择。尽管计划委员会进行了认真的工作,但此处未出现任何扩展的摘要被正式引用,并且预计大多数摘要都将以更加优美和完整的形式出现在推荐期刊中。我要感谢《经济理论杂志》和《游戏与经济行为》杂志的总编辑Karl Shell和Ehud Kalai,他们宣布在TARK IV程序中出现摘要不会影响完整版本的出版这些论文在他们的日记中。这使经济学家更容易向会议提交论文。我希望以后的会议中也能重复。

会议是由Alfred P. Sloan基金会赞助并赞助的。学生旅行补助金是由美国情报协会提供的。补充资金和行政支持由剑桥研究实验室和IBM Almaden研究中心提供。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号