首页> 外文会议>AIAA aviation technology, integration and operations conference;ATIO >Development of an Airline Revenue Capability Model for Aircraft Design
【24h】

Development of an Airline Revenue Capability Model for Aircraft Design

机译:飞机设计的航空公司收入能力模型的开发

获取原文

摘要

Typically value based approaches to the design of civil and commercial aircraft, be they net present value, surplus value, or any other utility based approach focus solely on the difference in cost between the alternatives, neglecting changes in revenue which might occur between the two concepts. Alternatively, if they do have a revenue focus, it is based upon simple relationships between payload capacity and revenue, assuming a either a fixed profit margin or fixed yield. This approach works well when comparing two similar or closely related concepts, but falls apart when investigating more radically different systems, e.g. a cruise efficient short take-off and landing concept. By using a value based approach it is relatively simple to structure a decision model to incorporate changing revenue capability. However, the ability to investigate differences in design is very much dependent upon the revenue model and assumptions that are made. If the revenue elasticity is the same for the two concepts then there is no benefit in using a variable revenue approach. However, in the cases where the elasticity is different, the revenue approach offers the potential to more properly investigate some fundamentally different alternative concepts.
机译:通常,以价值为基础的民用和民用飞机设计方法是净现值,剩余价值或任何其他基于公用事业的方法,其重点仅在于替代方案之间的成本差异,而忽略了这两种概念之间可能发生的收益变化。或者,如果它们确实以收入为重点,则它基于有效负载容量和收入之间的简单关系,并假设固定利润率或固定收益率。比较两个相似或密切相关的概念时,此方法效果很好,但是在研究更根本不同的系统(例如,巡航效率高的短距起降概念。通过使用基于价值的方法,构造决策模型以合并变化的收入能力相对简单。但是,调查设计差异的能力在很大程度上取决于收入模型和所做的假设。如果两个概念的收入弹性相同,则使用可变收入方法没有任何好处。但是,在弹性不同的情况下,收益法可能会更恰当地研究一些根本不同的替代概念。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号