【24h】

ANALYZING BENEFITS AND RISKS IN MEDICINE, TO WHOM AND FOR WHOM?

机译:分析医学,对谁以及对谁的益处和风险?

获取原文

摘要

The audience is often not explicitly named as part of a research study, but the framing of the research and the written results tend to be targeted toward particular addressees, without recognition of the impact of the boundaries. As researchers, we often think of this issue as one of "communication." We acknowledge that if our studies are to be understood more broadly, we must learn to write the results in non-scientific terms for a different audience. We do not often consider that research aimed at our traditional audiences may fail to consider the factors that could be the most crucial for the broader objectives our research is trying to achieve. It is within this context that a case study in benefit / risk illustrates the impact of framing and boundaries on the outcomes included in research. A current public debate in the UK and, to a lesser extent, in the US over the use of mammography screening for breast cancer reveals a great deal of well-intended information but not very much clarity. On its surface, defining the outcome of mammography as a benefit or risk would seem to be a straightforward exercise. However, the relative merits as discussed below would suggest otherwise.
机译:受众通常没有明确地命名为研究的一部分,但是研究的框架和书面结果往往针对特定的收件人,而没有意识到边界的影响。作为研究人员,我们经常将此问题视为“交流”之一。我们承认,如果要更广泛地理解我们的研究,我们必须学会以非科学的方式为不同的读者撰写结果。我们并不经常认为针对我们传统受众的研究可能没有考虑到对于我们的研究试图实现的更广泛目标而言最关键的因素。在这种情况下,关于利益/风险的案例研究说明了框架和边界对研究结果的影响。目前在英国,以及在较小程度上,在美国,关于使用乳腺钼靶筛查进行乳腺癌筛查的公开辩论揭示了很多意想不到的信息,但并不太清楚。从表面上看,将乳腺X线摄影的结果定义为获益还是风险似乎是一项简单的工作。但是,如下所述的相对优点将另外表明。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号