首页> 外文会议> >Correlation of Facial Infrared Thermograph and Carotid Stenosis
【24h】

Correlation of Facial Infrared Thermograph and Carotid Stenosis

机译:面部红外热像仪与颈动脉狭窄的相关性

获取原文

摘要

Facial temperature distribution is affected by blood flow supply, which is compromised in carotid stenosis. Therefore we conducted a study to compare the parameters of infrared thermograph of face and the result of simultaneous carotid angiography. Totally 26 consecutive patients underwent carotid digital subtraction angiography and the patency of common, external, and internal carotid was measured according to the principle of North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial . All the stenotic lesions detected were recorded as ECAS for external carotid stenosis, CCAS for common carotid stenosis, and ICAS for internal carotid stenosis. On the other hand, infrared thermograph of bilateral facial sides of the particiants was taken as well. Using a computerized programmatic strategy, the raw image data were processed to calculate the mean temperature and the standard deviation of each side of the 26 patients. In 52 samples (both sides of 26 patients)of this study, there are 29 (55.8%) CCAS, 25 (48.1%) ECAS, and 31 (59.6%)ICAS. The mean temperature of all 52 samples is 32.72 +/- 1.19 degree Celsius, and the average standard deviation of all the samples is 2.01 +/- 1.10 degree Celsius. The mean temperature of the ECAS group is significantly lower than that of non-ECAS group (32.33+/-1.03 versus 33.08+/-1.24 掳C, p=0.022), and the standard deviation of the facial temperature distribution is also lower in the CCAS patients (1.68+/-1.09 versus 2.31+/-1.04 掳C, p=0.037). In contrast, the ICAS group has the higher mean facial temperature (33.06 +/- 1.02 versus 32.22 +/- 1.28, p=0.
机译:面部温度分布受血流供应的影响,这会影响颈动脉狭窄。因此,我们进行了一项研究,以比较面部红外热像仪的参数和同时进行颈动脉造影的结果。总共26例连续患者接受了颈动脉数字减影血管造影,并根据北美有症状颈动脉内膜切除术试验的原则测量了颈总动脉,外部和内部的通畅性。将所有检测到的狭窄病变记录为:ECAS用于外颈动脉狭窄,CCAS用于普通颈动脉狭窄,ICAS用于内颈动脉狭窄。另一方面,还拍摄了参与者双侧面部的红外热像图。使用计算机程序化策略,对原始图像数据进行处理,以计算26例患者每侧的平均温度和标准偏差。在这项研究的52个样本(均为26例患者的两侧)中,有29个(55.8%)CCAS,25个(48.1%)ECAS和31个(59.6%)ICAS。所有52个样品的平均温度为32.72 +/- 1.19摄氏度,所有样品的平均标准偏差为2.01 +/- 1.10摄氏度。 ECAS组的平均温度显着低于非ECAS组的平均温度(32.33 +/- 1.03对33.08 +/- 1.24 pC,p = 0.022),面部温度分布的标准偏差也较低。 CCAS患者(1.68 +/- 1.09 vs 2.31 +/- 1.04掳C,p = 0.037)。相反,ICAS组的平均面部温度较高(33.06 +/- 1.02与32.22 +/- 1.28,p = 0。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号