首页> 外文会议> >Non-cooperative target identification of battlefield targets - classification results based on SAR images
【24h】

Non-cooperative target identification of battlefield targets - classification results based on SAR images

机译:战场目标的非合作目标识别-基于SAR图像的分类结果

获取原文

摘要

Non-cooperative target identification (NCTI) has become more and more important during the last years. So it is essential to develop robust classification schemes, which can be applied reliably in military operations. The major problems are the clutter (which is not present in air), the unknown target orientation (aspect and elevation angle), the high variability of the target scatterers and the possible multiple variants of the target. In this paper we concentrate on analysis and comparison of classification rates for target identification, the former detection process of the targets in the observed SAR scene will not be discussed. We focus on SAR images of single separated stationary and moving ground targets. To be able to compare our classification results with results published in literature we start our evaluation with the public MSTAR dataset, which is used since many years for ATR evaluation and identification. In addition to this we worked with a second dataset from another field measurement campaign which was performed by QinetiQ, UK. We quantify the influence of some fundamental key aspects on the classification rate. These subjects are target centering (using center of mass algorithms), image segmentation (target, clutter, target shadow), different applied classifiers (nearest neighbour classifier, support vector machines, SVM), the image resolution and the target orientation (knowledge of the aspect angle). Additionally we analyse the influence of clutter and target shadow on the classification rate when using again the MSTAR and QinetiQ datasets. For this purpose the data were segmented in a part containing the target (or target shadow) and another part containing only the surrounding clutter. For the QinetiQ dataset the classification rates drop from 79% to 70% when only the target (separated from the clutter) was used as a feature. The MSTAR dataset shows similar results. Thus obviously the identical background of each of the targets in the test and reference database contributed a lot to the reported high classification rates. That again shows that realistic expressions on the capabilities of target classification can only be based on independent test and training data. By introducing the image clutter content, ICC, we quantify the influence -of the separated clutter on the classification rate. Furthermore the target shadow can be used for additional information dependent on the depression angle. Finally we come to the conclusion that the main work is not only choosing and applying the classifier, but concentrate on the data collection (that means good data quality), preprocessing and feature extraction processes.
机译:在最近几年中,非合作目标识别(NCTI)变得越来越重要。因此,开发可靠的分类方案至关重要,该方案可以可靠地应用于军事行动。主要问题是混乱(空气中不存在),未知的目标方向(纵横比),目标散射体的高度可变性以及目标可能的多种变体。在本文中,我们集中在目标识别的分类率的分析和比较上,将不再讨论在观测到的SAR场景中目标的先前检测过程。我们专注于单个分离的静止和移动地面目标的SAR图像。为了能够将分类结果与文献中发表的结果进行比较,我们开始使用公开的MSTAR数据集进行评估,该数据集多年来一直用于ATR评估和识别。除此之外,我们还处理了另一个由英国QinetiQ进行的野外测量活动的第二个数据集。我们量化一些基本关键方面对分类率的影响。这些主题包括目标居中(使用质心算法),图像分割(目标,杂波,目标阴影),不同的应用分类器(最近邻分类器,支持向量机,SVM),图像分辨率和目标方向(长宽比)。此外,当再次使用MSTAR和QinetiQ数据集时,我们分析了杂波和目标阴影对分类率的影响。为此,将数据分割为一个包含目标(或目标阴影)的部分和另一个仅包含周围杂波的部分。对于QinetiQ数据集,当仅将目标(从杂波中分离)用作特征时,分类率从79%降至70%。 MSTAR数据集显示了相似的结果。因此,显然,测试和参考数据库中每个目标的背景相同,对报告的高分类率做出了很大贡献。这再次表明,关于目标分类能力的现实表达只能基于独立的测试和训练数据。通过引入图像杂波内容ICC,我们可以量化分离出的杂波对分类率的影响。此外,取决于俯角,可以将目标阴影用于其他信息。最后我们得出的结论是,主要工作不仅是选择和应用分类器,而且还要集中在数据收集(这意味着良好的数据质量),预处理和特征提取过程上。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号