首页> 外文会议> >Validation Of Simulation Platform By Comparing Results And Calculation Time Of Different Softwares
【24h】

Validation Of Simulation Platform By Comparing Results And Calculation Time Of Different Softwares

机译:通过比较不同软件的结果和计算时间来验证仿真平台

获取原文

摘要

The need of a powerful multiphysics software, to simulate different topologies of deformable micro structures, is under investigation. The criteria for choosing the software is the precision of the results with an acceptable time of calculation to simulate many models with different variables. The existance of a new software, COMSOL 3.3, at a time linking all the physics and having a good interactive interface seemed to be a good solution. Being new, and under development, COMSOL 3.3 needed to be valid on different points. As a first step, we validated the numerical platform by comparing results of different softwares and some analytical solutions. The basic advantages and drawbacks of each software were considered for the final decision on the choice of the software that will be used. In terms of time of calculation, we found very intressting results on the speed of COMSOL to solve the problem when compared to ANSYS, while keeping the same precision of calculation.
机译:正在研究是否需要功能强大的多物理场软件来模拟可变形微结构的不同拓扑。选择软件的标准是结果的精度和可接受的计算时间,以模拟具有不同变量的许多模型。一次将所有物理联系在一起并且具有良好的交互界面的存在是全新软件COMSOL 3.3的出现,似乎是一个不错的解决方案。作为新的且正在开发中的COMSOL 3.3必须在不同的方面有效。第一步,我们通过比较不同软件的结果和一些分析解决方案来验证数值平台。在选择将要使用的软件的最终决定时,考虑了每种软件的基本优缺点。在计算时间方面,与ANSYS相比,我们发现COMSOL的速度在解决该问题上非常令人赞叹,同时保持了相同的计算精度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号