首页> 外文会议> >A systematic approach to classifier selection on combining multiple classifiers for handwritten digit recognition
【24h】

A systematic approach to classifier selection on combining multiple classifiers for handwritten digit recognition

机译:一种结合多个分类器进行手写数字识别的分类器选择系统方法

获取原文

摘要

Much research has been done on combining multiple classifiers for handwritten character recognition to improve the performance of the classifier. Given a fixed set of classifiers using the same or different kinds of feature set, they focus on a methodology to combine all of the classifiers. In this paper, given a variable set of classifiers, we focus on a methodology to determine which subset of classifiers achieves the optimal combination results. In order to evaluate the dependency between classifiers, we propose a similarity measure between them which can be calculated from the errors generated by each classifier. This similarity measure allows us to compare the performance of one combination case relative to those of the other cases without performing any experiments. Using five individual neural net classifiers with different feature sets [gradient, structural, UDLRH (up-down left-right hole), mesh and LSF (large stroke feature)], we perform handwritten digit recognition experiments. With three combination methods [majority voting, Borda count and LCA (linear confidence accumulation)], we perform combination experiments for all possible cases of three classifiers selected from among the above five. Then, we compare their rankings in terms of the recognition rate with that in terms of the similarity measure. This comparison shows the effectiveness of the proposed method.
机译:关于组合多个分类器以用于手写字符识别以改善分类器的性能,已经进行了许多研究。给定使用相同或不同种类的特征集的固定分类器集,他们将重点放在组合所有分类器的方法上。在本文中,给定一组可变的分类器,我们重点研究一种确定哪些分类器子集达到最佳组合结果的方法。为了评估分类器之间的依赖性,我们提出了它们之间的相似性度量,可以从每个分类器产生的误差中计算出相似性。这种相似性度量使我们能够在不执行任何实验的情况下,将一个组合案例与其他案例的性能进行比较。我们使用五个具有不同特征集的单独神经网络分类器[梯度,结构,UDLRH(上下左右孔),网格和LSF(大笔划特征)],我们执行了手写数字识别实验。通过三种组合方法[多数投票,Borda计数和LCA(线性置信度累积)],我们对从以上五个中选择的三个分类器的所有可能情况进行了组合实验。然后,我们将它们在识别率方面的排名与在相似性度量方面的排名进行比较。这种比较表明了该方法的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号