首页> 外文会议> >Segmentation vs. non-segmentation based neural techniques for cursive word recognition: an experimental analysis
【24h】

Segmentation vs. non-segmentation based neural techniques for cursive word recognition: an experimental analysis

机译:基于分段与非分段神经网络技术的草书单词识别:实验分析

获取原文

摘要

This paper compares segmentation-based and non-segmentation based techniques for cursive word recognition. In our segmentation based technique, every word is segmented into characters, the chain code features are extracted from segmented characters, the features are fed to neural network classifier and finally the words are constructed using a string compare algorithm. In our non-segmentation based technique, the chain code features are extracted directly from words and the words are fed to a neural network classifier to classify them into word classes. To make fair comparison, CEDAR benchmark database is used, and the parameters such as the number of words, thresholding, resizing, feature extraction techniques, etc., are kept same for both the techniques. Experimental results show that the non-segmentation technique achieves much higher recognition rate than the segmentation based technique.
机译:本文比较了基于分段和基于非分段的草书单词识别技术。在我们的基于分割的技术中,将每个单词分割成字符,从分割的字符中提取链码特征,将这些特征馈送到神经网络分类器,最后使用字符串比较算法构造单词。在我们的基于非分段的技术中,直接从单词中提取链码特征,然后将单词馈入神经网络分类器以将其分类为单词类。为了进行公平的比较,使用了CEDAR基准数据库,并且这两种技术的参数(例如字数,阈值,调整大小,特征提取技术等)均保持相同。实验结果表明,非分割技术比基于分割的技术具有更高的识别率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号