首页> 外文会议> >If A1 is the answer, what was the question? An Edgy Naif's retrospective on promulgating the trusted computer systems evaluation criteria
【24h】

If A1 is the answer, what was the question? An Edgy Naif's retrospective on promulgating the trusted computer systems evaluation criteria

机译:如果答案是A1,那是什么问题?关于颁布可信计算机系统评估标准的Edgy Naif回顾

获取原文

摘要

This paper provides an introspective retrospective on the history and development of the United States Department of Defense Trusted Computer System Evaluation Criteria (TCSEC). Known to many as the Orange Book, the TCSEC contained a distillation of what many researchers considered to be the soundest proven principles and practices for achieving graded degrees of sensitive information protection on multiuser computing systems. While its seven stated evaluation classes were explicitly directed to standalone computer systems, many of its authors contended that its principles would stand as adequate guidance for the design, implementation, assurance, evaluation and certification of other classes of computing applications including database management systems and networks. The account is a personal reminiscence of the author, and concludes with a subjective assessment of the TCSEC's validity in the face of its successor evaluation criteria.
机译:本文对美国国防部可信计算机系统评估标准(TCSEC)的历史和发展进行了内省式回顾。 TCSEC被称为“橙皮书”,其中包含许多研究人员认为是在多用户计算系统上实现分级的敏感信息保护等级的最可靠的可靠原理和实践。尽管它的七个规定的评估类别明确地针对独立计算机系统,但其许多作者认为,其原理可以作为其他类别的计算应用程序(包括数据库管理系统和网络)的设计,实现,保证,评估和认证的适当指导。 。该叙述是作者的个人回忆,并根据其后续评估标准对TCSEC的有效性进行了主观评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号