首页> 外文会议> >Technology management in the network age: a report from the field based on a cross-regional comparison of technology-intensive entrepreneurial firms
【24h】

Technology management in the network age: a report from the field based on a cross-regional comparison of technology-intensive entrepreneurial firms

机译:网络时代的技术管理:基于对技术密集型创业公司的跨地区比较的实地报告

获取原文

摘要

Essential to the creation and development of innovative, high technology, knowledge-driven organizations is a tight symbiosis between regional culture and infrastructure. Although this symbiosis is often recognized anecdotally, there is virtually no systematic research testing whether regional cultures are a driving factor in the creation of successful technology ventures. In this paper, the authors compare four geographic regions using a diagnostic research tool specifically developed for profiling knowledge management practices in high-technology firms. As an outcome of their previous research, the authors have been able to identify those key practices that distinguish firms that we characterize as "leading-edge". In an analysis of high-technology centers around the globe, Wired magazine rated 46 regions from 1 (low) to 4 (high) on each of four factors: (1) the ability of area universities and research facilities to develop new technologies and to provide skilled knowledge professionals, (2) the presence of established companies and multinationals to provide expertise and economic stability, (3) the population's entrepreneurial drive to start new ventures and (4) the availability of venture capital to ensure that ideas make it to market. Of the four regions included in this study, two - Silicon Valley and Israel - were rated highest on the four factors. Two regions - Singapore and the Netherlands are rated lower. Therefore, if regional infrastructure and culture are key drivers for high technology innovation, we hypothesized that the highest performing organizations, as based on the results of the survey of knowledge management practices, will be found in the Silicon Valley and in Israel, with lower performing organizations found in the Netherlands and Singapore. No significant differences were found between Silicon Valley/Israel vs. Singapore/the Netherlands. However, key practices that were found to be common to leading-edge firms in all regions included: (1) a propensity for experimentation; (2) collective sharing of knowledge, and (3) collective decision-making. Overall, this paper (a) describes the research in terms of the four regions, (b) devices key determinants of competitiveness, (c) profiles regional characteristics which enhance innovation and entrepreneurship and (d) closes with a discussion on the implications of the research outcomes for entrepreneurial firms seeking to build a global presence.
机译:创新,高科技,知识驱动的组织的创造与发展至关重要,是区域文化与基础设施之间的严格共生。虽然这种共生通常是轶事认可,但几乎没有系统的研究测试,是否区域文化是在创造成功的技术风险的驱动因素。在本文中,作者使用专门为高科技公司进行分析知识管理实践而专门开发的诊断研究工具进行比较四个地理区域。作为其先前研究的结果,作者已经能够识别这些关键实践,以区分我们将其特征为“领导”的特征。在全球高科技中心的分析中,有线杂志评分为四个因素中的每一个(低)到4(高)的46个区域:(1)区域大学和研究设施开发新技术的能力提供熟练的知识专业人士,(2)建立公司和跨国公司的存在,提供专业知识和经济稳定,(3)人口的企业家驾驶开始新的企业和(4)风险投资的可用性,以确保想法使其成为市场。在本研究中包含的四个地区,两种 - 硅谷和以色列 - 在四个因素上被评为最高。两个地区 - 新加坡和荷兰被评为较低。因此,如果区域基础设施和文化是高科技创新的关键驱动因素,我们假设最高的表现组织,根据知识管理实践调查结果,将在硅谷和以色列中找到,绩效较低在荷兰和新加坡发现的组织。硅谷/以色列与新加坡/荷兰之间没有发现显着差异。但是,发现所有地区的前沿公司被发现的关键实践包括:(1)实验倾向; (2)集体共享知识,(3)集体决策。总体而言,本文(a)描述了四个地区,(b)竞争力的关键决定因素的研究,(c)概况提高创新和企业家的区域特征和(d)讨论讨论寻求建立全球业务的企业家研究成果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号