首页> 外文会议> >Comparison of multilevel coded modulations with different decoding methods for AWGN and Rayleigh fading channels
【24h】

Comparison of multilevel coded modulations with different decoding methods for AWGN and Rayleigh fading channels

机译:AWGN和瑞利衰落信道使用不同解码方法的多级编码调制的比较

获取原文

摘要

Multilevel coding (MLC) schemes based on channel capacity with multistage decoding (MSD) and parallel decoding on levels (PDL) are considered and compared. The channel models AWGN and Rayleigh fading are used in order to study the performance of MLC systems under different conditions. The investigation is done for 8ASK modulation and three set partitioning strategies. In each scheme BCH codes with different code lengths are used as component codes. Numerical results indicate that MSD is a sub-optimal decoding method of MLC for both channels, while PDL is most robust to varying channels if block partitioning (BP) is used. For Ungerboeck partitioning (UP) and mixed partitioning (MP) strategy, the MSD method is strongly recommended to use for the MLC system, while for the BP strategy, PDL is suggested to use as a simple decoding method compared with MSD.
机译:考虑并比较了基于信道容量,多级解码(MSD)和级别并行解码(PDL)的多级编码(MLC)方案。为了研究MLC系统在不同条件下的性能,使用了信道模型AWGN和瑞利衰落。对8ASK调制和三组划分策略进行了研究。在每个方案中,具有不同码长的BCH码被用作分量码。数值结果表明,对于两个通道,MSD是MLC的次优解码方法,而如果使用块分区(BP),则PDL对于变化的通道最可靠。对于Ungerboeck分区(UP)和混合分区(MP)策略,强烈建议将MSD方法用于MLC系统,而对于BP策略,建议将PDL与MSD相比用作一种简单的解码方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号