首页> 外文会议> >Scientific expertise and regulatory politics in Germany: the formative period of handling risks by agreeing on 'acceptable' standards, 1870-1913
【24h】

Scientific expertise and regulatory politics in Germany: the formative period of handling risks by agreeing on 'acceptable' standards, 1870-1913

机译:德国的科学专业知识和监管政治:通过商定“可接受的”标准来处理风险的形成时期,1870-1913年

获取原文

摘要

Regulatory politics relates to issues such as "technical safety", "environmental pollution", "public health" etc. Problems of this kind involve conflicts of interested parties as well as the belief in science as a powerful resource for coping with these problems: The instrumentalist function of science seems to open a "best way" of administering risks; the legitimizing function of science helps to ensure acceptance of risks. The paper concentrates on the formative, period of the "science-based regulatory state" since the 1870s. Relying on case studies, regulatory politics based on science will be characterized as a bargaining process (in contrast to a technocratic model of applying science to political problems). Empirically, examples are treated for technical safety (steam-boiler control, materials testing) and for environmental hazards (sanitary and industrial pollution of rivers).
机译:监管政治涉及诸如“技术安全”,“环境污染”,“公共卫生”等问题。此类问题涉及利益相关方的冲突以及对科学作为解决这些问题的有力资源的信念:科学的工具主义功能似乎为管理风险开辟了“最佳途径”。科学的合法化功能有助于确保接受风险。本文着眼于1870年代以来“基于科学的监管状态”的形成时期。依靠案例研究,基于科学的监管政治将被视为讨价还价的过程(与将科学应用于政治问题的技术官僚模式相反)。根据经验,对示例进行技术安全(蒸汽锅炉控制,材料测试)和环境危害(河流的卫生和工业污染)的处理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号