首页> 外文会议>Materials science amp; technology 2010 conference amp; exhibition >A comparative study of the compressive behaviour of 2099-T6 and 6061-T6 aluminum alloys under quasi-static and dynamic shock loading.
【24h】

A comparative study of the compressive behaviour of 2099-T6 and 6061-T6 aluminum alloys under quasi-static and dynamic shock loading.

机译:准静态和动态冲击载荷下2099-T6和6061-T6铝合金压缩行为的比较研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Aluminum 2099 is one of the recently developed aluminum alloys for high performancernaerospace applications. This alloy has been adequately characterized in tension underrnquasi–static loading. The current investigations focus on its behaviour in compressionrnunder both quasi-static and dynamic mechanical loading. The dynamic mechanicalrnloading was conducted by impacting the alloy with a blunt steel projectile at a momentumrnof 33 kg.m/s using an instrumented direct impact Hopkinson Bar. The deformationrnresponse of the 2099 aluminum alloy in the T6 tempered condition is discussed andrncompared with that of 6061-T6 aluminum alloy. Under the quasi–static loadingrncondition, plastic deformation is relatively homogeneous in both alloys, and is dominatedrnby strain hardening. Under the impact loading however, thermal softening plays arndominant role over strain hardening at the later stage of plastic deformation resulting inrnlow overall resistance to deformation. Similarly, deformation is also relativelyrnhomogeneous for 6061-T6 aluminum alloy under the impact momentum of 33 kg.m/s.rnIntense shear strain localisation leading to the development of adiabatic shear bandsrnoccur under the same impact loading condition for the 2099-T6 aluminum alloy. Thern2099–T6 aluminum alloy shows a better deformation resistance under quasi-staticrnloading while 6061-T6 aluminum alloy show superior mechanical behaviour under thernimpact loading.
机译:铝2099是用于高性能航空航天应用的最新开发的铝合金之一。该合金在准静态载荷下具有充分的拉伸特性。目前的研究集中于其在准静态和动态机械载荷下的压缩行为。动态机械加载是通过使用仪器直接冲击霍普金森棒以动量为33 kg.m / s的钝钢弹丸对合金进行冲击而进行的。讨论了2099铝合金在T6回火条件下的变形响应,并与6061-T6铝合金进行了比较。在准静态载荷条件下,两种合金的塑性变形相对均匀,并以应变硬化为主。然而,在冲击载荷下,在塑性变形的后期,热软化比应变硬化起着重要的作用,从而导致整体的抗变形能力降低。同样,对于6061-T6铝合金,在33 kg.m / s的冲击动量下,变形也相对不均匀。在相同的冲击载荷条件下,强烈的剪切应变局部化导致绝热剪切带的出现。 2099–T6铝合金在准静态载荷下表现出更好的抗变形性,而6061-T6铝合金在冲击载荷下表现出优异的机械性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号