首页> 外文会议>Joint annual meeting of the International Society of Exposure Science and the International Society for Environmental Epidemiology >Comparison of Heart Rate Variability Measurement Methods in Panels of Older Adults from the Outdoor Physical Activity and Health Study
【24h】

Comparison of Heart Rate Variability Measurement Methods in Panels of Older Adults from the Outdoor Physical Activity and Health Study

机译:从户外运动和健康研究中比较老年人组的心率变异性测量方法

获取原文

摘要

Background: Between May 2013 and August 2015, participants in 5 separate Outdoor Physical Activity and Health study panels were asked to undergo endothelial function testing (EndoPAT, Itamar Medical) and ambulatory electrocardiogram (Hotter) monitoring for heart rate variability (HRV) analysis. In research mode, the EndoPAT system also provides HRV data. Our objective was to compare HRV results from Holter and EndoPAT to determine if the two methods were comparable in a field study. Methods: 221 healthy, current non-smokers, aged 55-84 exercised outdoors daily for 30 minutes over the 10 week study period. Participants underwent weekly Holter monitoring (~5hrs; GE SEER), and EndoPAT testing before and after exercise. 5-minute windows of Holter data were analysed for HRV by trained technicians. Time matched EndoPAT HRV results were also collected. Pearson correlations between log-transformed Holter and Endopat HRV data were calculated, accounting for repeated measurements among participants, for all panels and participants, and by age, panel, body mass index (BMI) and sex. Results: Over the 5 panels, HRV was measured 3748 times using Holter monitors and 3680 times using EndoPATs. Participant characteristics varied between panels: mean age, 63-65 years, percent female, 56-71, and percent normal BMI, 14-46. For the 5 panels combined Holter and Endopat HRV time domain measures were strongly and significantly correlated (0.75 to 0.83, p < 0.0001), while Holter and Endopat HRV frequency domain measures were less strongly correlated (0.28 to 0.63, p < 0.0001). Correlations were consistent between panels, sexes, and BMI groups. Conclusion: Time domain HRV measures from Holter monitor and EndoPAT were strongly correlated. Where both endothelial function and HRV time domain are outcomes of interest, a single instrument to measure both parameters could reduce cost, analysis time, and participant burden.
机译:背景:2013年5月至2015年8月,要求5个独立的户外体育锻炼和健康研究小组的参与者进行内皮功能测试(EndoPAT,Itamar Medical)和动态心电图(Hotter)监测心率变异性(HRV)分析。在研究模式下,EndoPAT系统还提供HRV数据。我们的目的是比较Holter和EndoPAT的HRV结果,以确定两种方法在现场研究中是否具有可比性。方法:在为期10周的研究期内,每天有221名健康的当前不吸烟者(55-84岁)每天在户外锻炼30分钟。参与者在运动前后每周进行动态心电图监测(〜5小时; GE SEER),并进行EndoPAT测试。经过培训的技术人员对5分钟内的Holter数据窗口进行了HRV分析。还收集了时间匹配的EndoPAT HRV结果。计算对数转换的Holter和Endopat HRV数据之间的Pearson相关性,考虑到参与者之间,所有小组和参与者之间的重复测量,以及年龄,小组,体重指数(BMI)和性别。结果:在这5个面板上,使用Holter监测仪测量了3748次,使用EndoPATs测量了3680次,测量了HRV。参与者的特征在小组之间有所不同:平均年龄为63-65岁,女性百分比为56-71,正常BMI百分比为14-46。对于这5个面板,动态心电图和Endopat HRV时域测度之间有很强的相关性(0.75至0.83,p <0.0001),而动态心电图和Endopat HRV频域测度之间的相关性不强(0.28至0.63,p <0.0001)。小组,性别和BMI组之间的​​相关性是一致的。结论:来自Holter Monitor和EndoPAT的时域HRV度量值高度相关。如果内皮功能和HRV时域都是令人关注的结果,则同时测量这两个参数的单一仪器可以减少成本,分析时间和参与者负担。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号