【24h】

Up-Draught Solar Chimney and Down-Draught Energy Tower ― A Comparison

机译:上进风的太阳能烟囱和下进风的能源塔-比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Two power plant types that utilize a convective flow for electricity generation are discussed: The so-called 'Solar Chimney', and a down-draught power plant named 'Energy Tower'. Both power plants utilize a convective flow caused by the density difference between the air column inside a large chimney - open at the bottom and the top - and the surrounding atmosphere: 1. Inside a Solar Chimney the air is less dense than the adjacent atmospheric air outside the chimney. This is accomplished by combining a large air collector with the central chimney. Hot air is produced by solar radiation and flows up the chimney, driving turbines installed at the chimney base. 2. The air inside an Energy Tower is denser than the adjacent air outside the chimney due to water being sprayed into the chimney at the chimney top. The water evaporates, thus cooling the air inside the chimney below ambient temperature. The air therefore flows down the chimney. The thermodynamic basics required to model both power plants are given. Results obtained with the simple models are compared to each other, to the values found in literature, and ― in the case of the Solar Chimney ― to measured values of a Solar Chimney prototype. In the case of the Energy Tower a comparison to measured values was not possible, as no test results from a prototype have been published yet. In general, there is good agreement between the values found using the simple models and the values from literature. In the case of the Energy Tower this is true with the restriction that agreement is only found as long as very optimistic meteorological conditions are taken as given. Otherwise the calculated electric output is significantly lower than the numbers claimed by the proponent. It is found that under real world meteorological conditions the electric power that can be generated with an Energy Tower is in the range of one fifth up to a maximum of approximately one third of the electric power of a Solar Chimney of the same (chimney) dimensions. When comparing the two power plant types, it must be kept in mind that the Solar Chimney requires a large air collector surrounding the chimney, whereas the Energy Tower does not.
机译:讨论了两种利用对流进行发电的发电厂:所谓的“太阳能烟囱”和下垂式发电厂,称为“能源塔”。两家发电厂都利用对流流动,这是由大烟囱内部(底部和顶部敞开)的空气柱与周围大气之间的密度差引起的:1.在太阳烟囱内部,空气的密度低于相邻的大气在烟囱外。这是通过将大型空气收集器与中央烟囱相结合来实现的。太阳辐射产生的热空气沿烟囱向上流动,从而驱动安装在烟囱底部的涡轮机。 2.能量塔内的空气比烟囱外的相邻空气致密,这是因为有水喷到了烟囱顶部的烟囱中。水蒸发,从而将烟囱内的空气冷却到低于环境温度。因此,空气向下流向烟囱。给出了对两个电厂进行建模所需的热力学基础知识。使用简单模型获得的结果将相互比较,与文献中找到的值进行比较,并且在“太阳烟囱”的情况下,将其与太阳烟囱原型的测量值进行比较。在能源塔的情况下,无法与测量值进行比较,因为尚未发布原型的测试结果。通常,使用简单模型找到的值与文献中的值之间有很好的一致性。就能源塔而言,这是正确的,但前提是只有按照给出的非常乐观的气象条件才能达成协议。否则,计算出的电输出将大大低于支持者要求的数字。发现在现实世界的气象条件下,能量塔可产生的电能在相同(烟囱)尺寸的太阳能烟囱的电能的五分之一到最大约三分之一的范围内。在比较两种发电厂类型时,必须记住,太阳能烟囱需要在烟囱周围有一个大型集气器,而能源塔则不需要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号