首页> 外文会议>International Symposium on Flood Defence vol.2; 20020910-13; Beijing(CN) >Comparison between Muscl and Kfvs methods for 1-D shallow water equations
【24h】

Comparison between Muscl and Kfvs methods for 1-D shallow water equations

机译:一维浅水方程的Muscl和Kfvs方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A Kinetic Flux Vector Splitting (KFVS) scheme and a Flux Difference Splitting (FDS) scheme for 1-D shallow water equations are investigated. The KFVS scheme is based on the collisionless form of the Boltzmann equation. The FDS scheme is based on the exact Riemann solution of the gravity wave problem. In both schemes, the gravitational and frictional forces are included through operator splitting. In addition, both schemes are explicit and their numerical stability is governed by Courant-Frederich-Lewy (CFL) condition (i.e., Courant number ≤ 1.0). The comparison of both schemes are performed for the following cases: (ⅰ) a single dam break with horizontal and frictionless channel; (ⅱ) a double break with horizontal and frictionless channel; (ⅲ) a single dam break in the presence of gravitational and frictional force for which there is experimental data. The results show that both methods are of similar accuracy and efficiency. The shock and expansion waves are well resolved by both schemes. It is noted that the scalar nature of the Boltzmann equation means that the KFVS does not require characteristic decomposition and that its extension to multi-dimensional problems is relatively straightforward.
机译:研究了一维浅水方程的动力学通量矢量分裂(KFVS)方案和通量差分裂(FDS)方案。 KFVS方案基于Boltzmann方程的无碰撞形式。 FDS方案基于重力波问题的精确Riemann解。在这两种方案中,重力和摩擦力都通过操作员拆分来包括在内。此外,这两种方案都是显式的,其数值稳定性由Courant-Frederich-Lewy(CFL)条件(即Courant数≤1.0)控制。在以下情况下,对两种方案进行了比较:(ⅰ)具有水平和无摩擦通道的单个溃坝; (ⅱ)具有水平和无摩擦通道的双重中断; (ⅲ)在有重力和摩擦力的情况下发生的单个溃坝,有试验数据。结果表明,两种方法具有相似的准确性和效率。两种方案都很好地解决了冲击波和膨胀波。注意,玻耳兹曼方程的标量性质意味着KFVS不需要特征分解,并且它对多维问题的扩展相对简单。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号