首页> 外文会议>International oil spill conference (IOSC 2008) >EFFECT OF MIXING ENERGY, MIXING TIME AND SETTLING TIME ON DISPERSION EFFECTIVENESS IN TWO BENCH-SCALE TESTING SYSTEMS
【24h】

EFFECT OF MIXING ENERGY, MIXING TIME AND SETTLING TIME ON DISPERSION EFFECTIVENESS IN TWO BENCH-SCALE TESTING SYSTEMS

机译:混合能量,混合时间和沉降时间对两个Bench-scale测试系统中色散效率的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Dispersion experiments were conducted in baffled-flask and paddle-jar mixing systems at five energy dissipation rates ranging from 4.8 × 10~(-4) to 1.6 × 10~(-1) J/kg-s. The objective of these experiments was to investigate the effects of mixing energy, mixing time, and settling time on dispersion effectiveness and size distribution of the chemically dispersed oil droplets. Two separate combinations of evaporatively weathered Mars crude oil premixed with dispersants differing in hydrophile-lipophile balance (HLB) (12 and 10) but having the same chemical composition (Tween 80 and Span 80 in dodecane) were used. Dispersion effectiveness increased with energy dissipation rate to a maximum and then leveled for all cases studied. In the baffled flask, dispersion effectiveness reached a maximum of 82 ± 5% irrespective of oil-dispersant combination. In the paddle jar, the maximum value of dispersion effectiveness was oil-dispersant specific, being at 87 ± 9% and 30 ± 11% for dispersant HLB 12 and 10, respectively. Mixing time did not seem to have a significant effect on dispersion effectiveness in comparison to the effects of energy dissipation rates and oil-dispersant combinations. The normalized volume distributions of the dispersed oil droplets were tri-modal in both systems, suggesting that multiple mechanisms of droplet formation occurred. The largest droplet mode disappeared from the size distribution in dispersions produced in the baffled flask when the mixing energy was ≥1.6 × 10~(-2) Jlkg-s. A similar behavior was also observed in the paddle jar for the oil-dispersant combination of HLB 12, but not for HLB 10. Inclusion of a settling period of 20 minutes before collecting sample decreased the dispersion effectiveness in paddle jar but no significant changes were observed in the baffled flask system. The differences observed were due to the differences in the size distributions of the dispersed oil droplets generated in these two systems.
机译:在带挡板的烧瓶和桨罐混合系统中进行分散实验,以4.8×10〜(-4)至1.6×10〜(-1)J / kg-s的五个能量耗散率进行分散实验。这些实验的目的是研究混合能量,混合时间和沉降时间对化学分散油滴的分散效果和尺寸分布的影响。使用蒸发风化的火星原油与分散剂的两种单独组合,这些分散剂的亲水亲脂平衡(HLB)不同(12和10),但化学成分相同(十二烷中的Tween 80和Span 80)。分散效率随着能量耗散率的增加而增加,然后在所有研究的案例中均达到平衡。在带挡板的烧瓶中,无论油分散剂的组合如何,分散效率最高可达82±5%。在浆瓶中,分散效果的最大值是特定于油分散剂的,HLB 12和10的分散剂分别为87±9%和30±11%。与能量耗散率和油分散剂组合的影响相比,混合时间似乎对分散效果没有显着影响。在两个系统中,分散油滴的归一化体积分布均为三峰模式,表明发生了多种油滴形成机理。当混合能量≥1.6×10〜(-2)Jlkg-s时,最大的液滴模式从挡板烧瓶中产生的分散液的尺寸分布中消失。对于HLB 12的油分散剂组合,在桨罐中也观察到了类似的行为,但对于HLB 10却没有。在挡板烧瓶系统中。观察到的差异是由于在这两个系统中生成的分散油滴的尺寸分布不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号