【24h】

Influence of cementation and density on G_(max) for sand

机译:胶结作用和密度对砂土G_(max)的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper presents data on the variation of G_(max) with stress level and density for uncemented and cemented sands. This has been obtained using a technique developed by the authors for the continuous monitoring of G_(max) during consolidation and shearing in triaxial tests. This technique has been used to investigate the variation of G_(max) for Toyoura sand and a carbonate sand subject to a range of stress paths. The results for these uncemented sands are broadly consistent with other published data but suggest that the effects of mean effective stress, p′, are not being correctly predicted by existing empirical relations at higher stress levels. Further tests have been performed on the carbonate sand which has been artifically cemented and prepared at a range of cement contents and densities. It has been found that existing empirical expressions are generally poor at estimating G_(max). An equation has been developed that relates G_(max) to density, stress level and cement content. The paper presents briefly the methodology, some typical results and some comparisons with existing empirical approaches for estimating G_(max).
机译:本文介绍了非胶结和胶结砂土的G_(max)随应力水平和密度变化的数据。这是使用作者开发的一项技术获得的,该技术用于在三轴试验的固结和剪切过程中连续监测G_(max)。该技术已被用于研究在一定应力路径范围内丰谷砂和碳酸盐砂的G_(max)变化。这些非胶结砂的结果与其他已发表的数据大致一致,但表明在较高应力水平下,现有经验关系并不能正确预测平均有效应力p'的影响。已对已人工胶结并在一定范围的水泥含量和密度下制备的碳酸盐砂进行了进一步的测试。已经发现,现有的经验表达式通常在估计G_(max)时很差。已经开发出将G_(max)与密度,应力水平和水泥含量相关的方程。本文简要介绍了用于估计G_(max)的方法,一些典型结果以及与现有经验方法的一些比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号