首页> 外文会议>International conference on marine pollution liability amp; policy : Papers collection >A Comparison of the Recovery of Compensation for Injury to Natural Resources under the 92 CLC and Fund Conventions with the U.S. Oil Pollution Act of 1990
【24h】

A Comparison of the Recovery of Compensation for Injury to Natural Resources under the 92 CLC and Fund Conventions with the U.S. Oil Pollution Act of 1990

机译:根据92个CLC和基金公约与1990年《美国石油污染法》对自然资源损害赔偿的追偿进行比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

As the title states, this paper will compare the approach of compensation for injury to natural resources caused by the discharge of oil under several international Conventions to which the U.S. is not a party and compensation under U.S. law. The Conventions are the International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage, 1992,1 The International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage, 1969,2 the International Convention on the Establishment of an International Fund for Compensation for Oil Pollution Damage, 1992,3 and the International Convention on the Establishment of an International Fund for Compensation for Oil Pollution Damage, 1971.4 For simplicity, the paper will focus on the current 1992 Conventions-the CLC and Fund Convention (collectively the "Conventions").
机译:如标题所述,本文将比较根据美国未加入的几个国际公约,对因排放石油而造成的自然资源损害的赔偿方法和根据美国法律的赔偿方法。这些公约是1992年《国际油污损害民事责任公约》 1、1969年《国际油污损害民事责任公约》 2、1992年《设立国际油污损害赔偿基金国际公约》, 3和建立国际油污损害赔偿基金国际公约1971.4为简单起见,本文将重点关注当前的1992年公约(CLC和基金公约)(统称为“公约”)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号