首页> 外文会议>The International Conference on Inland Shipping Technology(ICIST 2007) >Ship Risk of Collision Judging Indices Comparison of Subjective Method and Objective Method
【24h】

Ship Risk of Collision Judging Indices Comparison of Subjective Method and Objective Method

机译:船舶碰撞风险判断指标主客观方法比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Up to now there are many ship risk of collision judging indices. The most famous and widely accepted index is DCPA and TCPA. In Japan some researchers brought forward SJ and Bumper Model as risk of collision index in a congested waters. This paper has introduced the calculating methods used for DCPA, TCPA,SJ and Bumper, and analysed their differences when using these indices.After simulating ships movement and comparing these indices' advantages and shortcomings, the paper has concluded that DCPA and TCPA are more useful for ship preventing collision and automation of navigation in open sea while SJ and bumper model are more visual to describe the risk of collision in the congested waters
机译:到现在为止,有很多船舶有碰撞判定指数的风险。最著名和被广泛接受的索引是DCPA和TCPA。在日本,一些研究人员提出了SJ和Bumper模型作为在拥挤水域中碰撞指数的风险。本文介绍了用于DCPA,TCPA,SJ和Bumper的计算方法,并分析了使用这些指标时的差异。在模拟船舶运动并比较这些指标的优点和缺点之后,得出结论DCPA和TCPA更有用用于船舶的防撞和公海航行的自动化,而SJ和保险杠模型更直观地描述了在拥挤水域发生碰撞的风险

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号