首页> 外文会议>International conference on information systems;ICIS 2008; 20081214-17;20081214-17; Paris(FR);Paris(FR) >Market Frictions, Demand Structure and Price Competition in Online Markets
【24h】

Market Frictions, Demand Structure and Price Competition in Online Markets

机译:在线市场的市场摩擦,需求结构和价格竞争

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Recent empirical evidence shows the Law of One Price does not exist in online environment despite the unprecedented amount of price transparency. The failure of Law of One Price has been attributed to search costs, brand loyalty and other kinds of "market frictions" that enable retailers to keep some of their customers even if they don't charge the lowest price in the market. While the presence of such frictions has been carefully studied, little is known empirically on how they affect consumer demand structure that is at the core of retailers' pricing and marketing strategies. In this paper, we identify the impact of market friction on demand structure by empirically demonstrating a well-known insight from economic theory that market frictions could lead to a kink in consumer demand function. Using a unique dataset on prices and demand collected from Amazon and BarnesandNoble.com (BN), we first demonstrate the existence of consumer segments that demonstrate significant amount of frictions against shopping for lowest prices. Then we incorporate this finding and build an empirical model to show that significant jumps in price elasticity exist at points where price changes occur, which in turn, manifests as kinks in the aggregate demand function. Moreover, the jumps have opposite directions on Amazon and BN, indicating that market frictions have different implications across the two major online retailers. By examining kinks in demand functions, we contribute to prior empirical literature that has typically considered a constant level of price elasticity. We find that, on Amazon, price elasticity increases after a price reduction, suggesting that customers face low search costs for price information on Amazon or low brand loyalty toward BN. On the other hand, price elasticity decreases after a price reduction on BN, suggesting customers face high search costs for price information on BN or high brand loyalty towards Amazon. Further, an analysis of the differences in jumps in price elasticity for popular books compared to rare or unpopular books reveals that market friction is much higher for unpopular books. These findings suggest that online retailers have the potential to extract more value from the emergence of the Long Tail phenomenon.
机译:最近的经验证据表明,尽管价格透明程度空前,但在线环境中不存在“一价定律”。 “一价定律”的失败归因于搜索成本,品牌忠诚度和其他类型的“市场摩擦”,即使零售商不对市场收取最低价格,他们也可以保留一些客户。尽管已经仔细研究了这种摩擦的存在,但从经验上对摩擦如何影响消费者需求结构知之甚少,而消费者需求结构是零售商定价和营销策略的核心。在本文中,我们通过经验证明了经济学理论中的一个众所周知的见解,即市场摩擦可能导致消费者需求函数的扭结,从而确定了市场摩擦对需求结构的影响。我们使用从亚马逊和BarnesandNoble.com(BN)收集的关于价格和需求的独特数据集,首先证明了存在细分的消费者群体,这些群体显示出对以最低价格购物的巨大摩擦。然后,我们结合这一发现并建立一个经验模型,以显示在价格变化发生的点,价格弹性存在显着的跃变,这反过来在总需求函数中表现为扭结。此外,亚马逊和BN的增长方向相反,表明市场摩擦在两家主要的在线零售商之间有着不同的含义。通过研究需求函数中的纽结,我们为以前的经验文献做出了贡献,这些文献通常认为价格弹性水平是恒定的。我们发现,在亚马逊上,降价后价格弹性增加,这表明客户在亚马逊上获取价格信息的搜索成本较低,或者对BN的品牌忠诚度较低。另一方面,BN降价后,价格弹性下降,这表明客户面临有关BN价格信息或品牌对亚马逊忠诚度高的搜索成本。此外,对与不受欢迎或不受欢迎的书相比,流行书价格弹性跳升的差异的分析表明,不受欢迎的书的市场摩擦要高得多。这些发现表明,在线零售商有可能从长尾现象的出现中获得更多价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号