首页> 外文会议>International Conference on OCEANS MTS/IEEE Washington >Validation and sensitivity experiments comparing the physical parameterization of numerical wave model
【24h】

Validation and sensitivity experiments comparing the physical parameterization of numerical wave model

机译:验证和灵敏度实验,比较数值波模型的物理参数

获取原文

摘要

The Korean Peninsula is surrounded by the sea on three sides except for the northern part, In order to simulate sea state, Korea Meteorological Administration (KMA) has been operating WAVEWATCHIII (WW3) since 2008, which is numerical wave model it was constructed in operational wave forecasting system. Recently, new version of WW3, version 4.18, was officially released and construction of new operational wave forecasting system is performed for upgrading the previous system that is version 2.22. Therefore, the objective of this study is to conduct a comparison of energy input and dissipation source term of WAM4 for comparison and verification of WAM4 with Tolman and Chalikov (TCL) option. In conclusion, the more bias was decrease as wind-wave energy growth term increase. And the more bias was decrease as the more wind-wave energy growth term was increase. The verification results of physical option during two seasons shown negative bias both option WAM4 and TCL. The negative bias was improved in winter, but summer season was shown an opposite result. Also, forecasting performance was better result in summer, but performance was deteriorated after 36 forecast hour.
机译:朝鲜半岛北部以外的三面都被大海包围,为了模拟海况,韩国气象局(KMA)自2008年以来一直在运行WAVEWATCHIII(WW3),这是在运行中构造的数值波浪模型。波浪预报系统。最近,正式发布了新版本的WW3(版本4.18),并进行了新的运行波预报系统的构建,以升级先前的版本2.22。因此,本研究的目的是对WAM4的能量输入和耗散源项进行比较,以便使用Tolman和Chalikov(TCL)选项对WAM4进行比较和验证。总而言之,随着风波能量增长项的增加,偏倚减小。随着风波能量增长项的增加,偏见也减小。两个季节中实物期权的验证结果显示期权WAM4和TCL均为负偏差。冬季,负偏见有所改善,但夏季却显示出相反的结果。另外,夏季的预报性能较好,但在预报36小时后性能下降。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号