首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Man-Machine-Environment System Engineering >The Comparison Study of Usability Test Methodology Based on Eye-Tracking Technology
【24h】

The Comparison Study of Usability Test Methodology Based on Eye-Tracking Technology

机译:基于眼动技术的可用性测试方法的比较研究

获取原文

摘要

Eye-tracking technology, as an objective-recording method of user's eye movement data, has widely been applied in human-computer interface usability test. The quantitative analysis of eye movement data is good at comparing different UI designs; however, it can hardly probe the influential factors of usability issues from a UCD perspective. This research aimed at improving the validity of usability test, and tried to fill in the gap of merely applying eye movement data in usability test. In this paper, we compared the characteristics and differences of concurrent and retrospective think-aloud on UI usability evaluation, which were combined with eye-tracking system. We found that concurrent think-aloud would interfere users during the tests, thus increased their mental stress and cognitive workload, which suits assessing simple-operation and low-cognitive-workload tasks; the retrospective think-aloud enables user to operate more naturally, thus is proper for more complex task chain testing. Moreover, the retrospective think-aloud is more efficient for analyzing the cognitive factors of usability issues in-depth.
机译:眼动追踪技术作为用户眼动数据的客观记录方法,已广泛应用于人机界面的可用性测试中。眼动数据的定量分析擅长于比较不同的UI设计。但是,它几乎无法从UCD的角度探究可用性问题的影响因素。这项研究旨在提高可用性测试的有效性,并试图填补仅在可用性测试中应用眼动数据的空白。在本文中,我们比较了UI可用性评估中并发和回顾性思维模式与眼动追踪系统相结合的特征和差异。我们发现并发思维能力会在测试过程中干扰用户,从而增加他们的心理压力和认知工作量,适合评估简单操作和低认知工作量任务;回顾性思维能力使用户可以更自然地进行操作,因此适合进行更复杂的任务链测试。此外,回顾性思考方式对于深入分析可用性问题的认知因素更为有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号