【24h】

Prediction of oil reservoir porosity based on BP-ANN

机译:基于BP神经网络的储层孔隙度预测。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Porosity of oil reservoir rock is usually determined by Core Analysis. But this method is expensive and time consuming. Also because of lithology changes, heterogeneity of reservoir rock, and nonexistence of sufficient well cores, determination of the parameters by the usual methods is not accurate. So the best way to decrease cost, increase accuracy, and decrease time is applying advanced software such as Geolog and Back-Propagation of Error Artificial Neural Network (BP-ANN). In this paper, a BP-ANN was designed to predict the porosity of formations using the well logs data in Parsi field, located in southwest of Iran. The data of two wells (No. 33 and No. 19) that have core data were used for training, testing, validation, and generalization processes. Then the BP-ANN results were compared to evaluations obtained from Geolog Software (GS). With respect to the results, it was concluded that the BP-ANN is more accurate than GS in determining oil reservoir porosity. At the end, porosity was simulated in three other wells (No. 48, 49, and 64) that lack core data.
机译:油藏岩石的孔隙度通常通过岩心分析来确定。但是这种方法既昂贵又费时。同样由于岩性的变化,储层岩石的非均质性以及不存在足够的井芯,用常规方法确定参数是不准确的。因此,降低成本,提高准确性和减少时间的最佳方法是应用高级软件,例如Geolog和误差人工神经网络(BP-ANN)的反向传播。本文设计了一个BP神经网络,利用位于伊朗西南部Parsi油田的测井数据预测地层的孔隙度。具有核心数据的两口井(第33号井和第19号井)的数据用于训练,测试,验证和归纳过程。然后将BP-ANN结果与从Geolog Software(GS)获得的评估结果进行比较。关于结果,得出的结论是,在确定油藏孔隙度时,BP-ANN比GS更准确。最后,在缺少核心数据的其他三口井(第48、49和64号)中模拟了孔隙度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号