首页> 外文会议>Information Resources Management Association International Conference vol.1; 20040523-26; New Orleans,LA(US) >New Public Management and E-Government: Trajectories of a Marriage between Managerial and Technological Reform in Government
【24h】

New Public Management and E-Government: Trajectories of a Marriage between Managerial and Technological Reform in Government

机译:新公共管理与电子政务:政府管理与技术改革的结合轨迹

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Bureaucracy is a bad word in the beginning of the 21st century. Despite its idealtypical characteristics of efficient operations and ubiquitous (political) accountability, actual manifestations of public bureaucracies may result in slow operations, diminished citizen orientation and less than perfect responsiveness. In a sense, ICT can be accused of being an accomplice this situation. Nohria and Berkley state that until recently, "[c]omputer systems and software adopted the 'architecture' of bureaucracy [...]. Not surprisingly the language of information systems became the language of bureaucracy" (Nohria & Berkley, 1994: 120). In is not surprising then, that over the last decades, the concept of bureaucracy, as embodied in the 'classic' public administration paradigm (Behn, 2001), has been contested and reshaped by a variety of managerial and technological reforms. 'New public management' (Behn, 2001; Osborne & Gaebler, 1992) has resulted in emphasis on the ideas of expediency, efficiency and economy (Pollitt, 2000). Furthermore, e-government has emerged (Fountain, 2001). A successful marriage seems to emerge from two types of reform (Bellamy & Taylor, 1998; Heeks, 2001). However, both types of reform refer to very broad patterns of change and therefore, claims of concordance or resentments of directions of managerial and technological innovations taking place in the public sector at this moment may be unjustified.
机译:官僚主义在21世纪初是一个坏词。尽管其具有高效运营和无处不在的(政治)问责制的典型特征,但公共官僚机构的实际表现可能会导致运营缓慢,公民取向减弱以及响应能力不足。从某种意义上讲,可以指责ICT是这种情况的帮凶。 Nohria和Berkley指出,直到最近,“计算机系统和软件都采用了官僚主义的“体系结构”。信息系统的语言成为官僚主义的语言就不足为奇了”(Nohria&Berkley,1994:120 )。因此,毫不奇怪,在过去的几十年中,“经典”公共行政范式(Behn,2001年)所体现的官僚主义概念已因各种管理和技术改革而受到质疑和重塑。 “新公共管理”(Behn,2001; Osborne&Gaebler,1992)导致重视权宜之计,效率和经济(Pollitt,2000)。此外,电子政务已经出现(Fountain,2001)。成功的婚姻似乎来自两种类型的改革(Bellamy&Taylor,1998; Heeks,2001)。但是,两种类型的改革都涉及非常广泛的变革模式,因此,目前在公共部门进行的一致的管理或技术创新的方向的主张或怨恨可能是不合理的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号