【24h】

Nordic Intercomparison of Calibration of the Material Testing Machines Report of the Force Calibration

机译:北欧材料测试机校准比较报告力校准报告

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

For us there was not known intercomparison for the calibration of uniaxial testing machine. It was the reason to work out this- kind of comparison during the year 1999. By planning the comparison there was two main problems by this kind of comparison. The first one; the object can not be circulated from calibrating laboratory to next one. The second one is that the testing machine should be measured to get the status of a reference standard. The first problem was solved tat every laboratory had to travel to the location, where testing machine was. Second problem meant that the history of testing machine should be known well and the calibration of the pilot should be made very careful. FINAS has organized this intercomparison for the calibration of the uniaxial testing machine in the year 1999 in Finland. There was three laboratories participating the comparison, two from Finland and one from Denmark. The results has shown some main problems: 1. The stability of the testing machine must be investigated well 2. The calibration method for force has high importance This paper gives some numerical value of these problems and the experiences during the intercomparison.
机译:对我们而言,单轴测试机的校准尚无比较方法。这就是在1999年进行这种比较的原因。通过计划比较,这种比较存在两个主要问题。第一个;该对象不能从校准实验室传送到下一个。第二个是应该对测试机进行测量以获得参考标准的状态。解决了第一个问题,即每个实验室必须前往测试机器所在的位置。第二个问题意味着应充分了解测试机的历史,并应非常小心地校准飞行员。 FINAS于1999年在芬兰组织了这种比对,用于单轴测试机的校准。有三个实验室参加了比较,其中两个来自芬兰,一个来自丹麦。结果表明存在以下主要问题:1.必须对试验机的稳定性进行深入研究; 2.力的校准方法具有重要意义。本文给出了这些问题的一些数值,以及进行比较的经验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号