首页> 外文会议>Image Processing pt.2; Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging; vol.6 no.24 >On the Adequacy of Principal Factor Analysis for the Study of Shape Variability
【24h】

On the Adequacy of Principal Factor Analysis for the Study of Shape Variability

机译:主形状分析在形状变异性研究中的适用性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The analysis of shape variability of anatomical structures is of key importance in a number of clinical disciplines, as abnormality in shape can be related to certain diseases. Statistical shape analysis techniques commonly employed in the medical imaging community, such as Active Shape Models or Active Appearance Models rely on Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to decompose shape variability into a reduced set of interpretable components. In this paper we propose Principal Factor Analysis (PFA) as an alternative to PCA and argue that PFA is a better suited technique for medical imaging applications. PFA provides a decomposition into modes of variation that are more easily interpretable, while still being a linear, efficient technique that performs dimensionality reduction (as opposed to Independent Component Analysis, ICA). Both PCA and PFA are described. Examples are provided for 2D landmark data of corpora callosa outlines, as well as vector-valued 3D deformation fields resulting from non-rigid registration of ventricles in MRI. The results show that PFA is a more descriptive tool for shape analysis, at a small cost in size (as in theory more components may be necessary to explain a given percentage of total variance in the data). In conclusion, we argue that it is important to study the potential of factor analysis techniques other than PCA for the application of shape analysis, and defend PFA as a good alternative.
机译:在许多临床学科中,解剖结构的形状变异性分析至关重要,因为形状异常可能与某些疾病有关。在医学成像社区中常用的统计形状分析技术,例如“活动形状模型”或“活动外观模型”,都依赖于主成分分析(PCA)将形状可变性分解为一组减少的可解释成分。在本文中,我们提出了主因子分析(PFA)作为PCA的替代方法,并认为PFA是更适合医学成像应用的技术。 PFA将分解模式分解为更易于解释的模式,同时仍是一种线性高效的技术,可进行降维(与独立成分分析(ICA)相对)。描述了PCA和PFA。提供了示例性的体轮廓的2D界标数据,以及在MRI中因心室的非刚性配准而产生的矢量值3D变形场。结果表明,PFA是形状分析的一种更具描述性的工具,但成本却很小(因为从理论上讲,可能需要更多的组件才能解释给定百分比的数据总方差)。总之,我们认为重要的是,研究PCA以外的因素分析技术在形状分析中的潜力,并捍卫PFA是一个很好的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号