【24h】

Citizen Gain: The Story of the West Valley Citizen Task Force

机译:公民收益:西山谷公民工作队的故事

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Throughout the 1980s and 90s, the managers of nuclear waste cleanup sites have expended a great deal ofrntime and energy to enhance public involvement in site operations. The question that we, as site managers, have tornask ourselves is, has it been worth the effort? And, if it has, what have we learned from the experience? At thernWestern New York Nuclear Service Center (Center), the New York State Energy Research and DevelopmentrnAuthority (NYSERDA) learned some valuable lessons while working with a community advisory group.rnIn January 1997, NYSERDA, with participation from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), brought 16rnindividuals of diverse background, experience, and interest together to formulate recommendations on therndevelopment of a preferred option for closing and/or managing the facilities at the Center. The West Valley CitizenrnTask Force began meeting twice a month. From the outset, NYSERDA and DOE were committed to finding outrnwhat was important to the community regarding the future management of the site, though, at the beginning, thernTask Force was wary of the sincerity of this commitment .rnIn July 1998, 19 months since its first meeting, the Task Force submitted a recommendations report tornNYSERDA and DOE containing its policies and priorities regarding the future management of the site and specificrnguidelines for the closure option. All 16 members of the Task Force signed the report. The completion of the reportrnindicates the success of one part of the process -- the consensus of the Task Force regarding the future managementrnof the Center.rnNext, NYSERDA and DOE must forge ahead to address their recommendations in the development of arncleanup plan for the site, while not discarding what has been gained along the way, which is a deeper, more trustingrnrelationship with the Task Force members. Their recommendations are representative of the community’s values atrna given point in time. The relationships, however, are dynamic and, with good faith already established, provide therngreatest opportunity for developing an even deeper level of trust with the community.
机译:在整个1980年代和90年代,核废料清理场址的管理者花费了大量的时间和精力来提高公众对场址运营的参与度。作为站点管理者,我们不得不烦恼自己的问题是,值得付出努力吗?而且,如果有的话,我们从经验中学到了什么?在纽约西部核服务中心(Center),纽约州能源研究与发展局(NYSERDA)在与社区咨询小组合作时吸取了一些宝贵的经验教训。1997年1月,NYSERDA在美国能源部(DOE)的参与下),汇集了16名具有不同背景,经验和兴趣的个人,以制定有关开发关闭和/或管理中心设施的首选方案的建议。西山谷市民工作队每月开始开会两次。从一开始,NYSERDA和DOE致力于寻找对于社区的未来管理至关重要的事情,尽管一开始,任务组就警惕了这一承诺的诚意。rn1998年7月,距其成立19个月在第一次会议上,工作队向NYSERDA和DOE提交了一份建议报告,其中载有其关于该厂址未来管理的政策和优先事项以及关闭方案的具体指南。工作队的所有16名成员都签署了报告。报告的完成表示该过程的一部分成功-工作组就该中心的未来管理达成了共识。下一步,NYSERDA和DOE必须努力在制定该站点的arncleanup计划时解决他们的建议,同时不放弃在此过程中获得的成果,这与工作组成员之间的关系更加深入,更加信任。他们的建议代表了社区在特定时间点的价值观。但是,这种关系是动态的,并且已经建立起真诚的关系,为与社区建立更深层次的信任提供了最美好的机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号