首页> 外文会议>Heavy oil: integrating the pieces >Top-Injection and Bottom-Production (Tinbop) Cyclic Steam-Injection MethodEnhances Oil Recovery
【24h】

Top-Injection and Bottom-Production (Tinbop) Cyclic Steam-Injection MethodEnhances Oil Recovery

机译:顶部注入和底部生产(Tinbop)循环蒸汽注入方法可提高石油采收率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We have developed a novel method to enhance oil productionrnduring cyclic steam injection. In the Top-Injection andrnBottom-Production (TINBOP) method, the well contains twornstrings separated by two packers (a dual and a single packer):rnthe short string (SS) is completed in the top quarter of thernreservoir, while the long string (LS) is completed in thernbottom quarter of the reservoir. The method requires an initialrnwarm-up stage where steam is injected into both strings for 21rndays; then the LS is opened to production while the SSrncontinues to inject steam for 14 days. After the initial warm-up,rnthe following schedule is repeated: the LS closed andrnsteam is injected in the SS for 21 days; then steam injection isrnstopped and the LS is opened to production for 180 days.rnThere is no soak period.rnWe have simulated and compared the performance of thernTINBOP method against that of a conventional cyclic steamrninjector (perforated across the whole reservoir). Threernreservoir types were simulated using 2-D radial, black oilrnmodels: Hamaca (9°API), San Ardo (12°API) and the SPErnfourth comparative solution project (14°API). For the first tworntypes, a 20x1x20 10-acre model was used that incorporatedrntypical rock and fluid properties for these fields.rnSimulation results indicate oil recovery after 10 years arern5.7-27% OIIP with TINBOP, I.e. 57-93% higher thanrnconventional cyclic steam injection (3.3-14% OIIP). Steam-oilrnratios are also decreased with TINBOP (0.8-3.1) comparedrnto conventional (1.2-5.3), resulting from the improvedrnreservoir heating efficiency.
机译:我们已经开发出一种新颖的方法来提高循环蒸汽注入过程中的产油量。在顶部注入和底部生产(TINBOP)方法中,井包含两个由两个封隔器(双封隔器和单个封隔器)分隔的管柱:短管柱(SS)在储层的上四分之一处完成,而长管柱( LS)在油藏底部的四分之一处完成。该方法需要一个预热阶段,在该阶段中,将蒸汽注入两个管柱中持续21天。然后LS投入生产,而SSrn继续注入蒸汽14天。初始预热后,重复以下时间表:LS关闭并在SS中注入蒸汽21天;然后停止蒸汽注入,并且LS可以生产180天。rn没有浸泡时间。rn我们模拟了TINBOP方法与常规循环蒸汽注入器(贯穿整个储层)的性能并进行了比较。使用2-D径向黑色油模型模拟了三种储层类型:Hamaca(9°API),San Ardo(12°API)和SPErnthth比较方案项目(14°API)。对于前两种类型,使用20x1x20 10英亩模型,这些模型结合了这些油田的典型岩石和流体属性。模拟结果表明,使用TINBOP,即10年后的石油采收率为5.7-27%OIIP。比常规的循环蒸汽注入(OIIP的3.3-14%)高57-93%。与常规的(1.2-5.3)相比,TINBOP(0.8-3.1)的蒸汽油比也降低了,这是由于提高了油藏的加热效率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号