首页> 外文OA文献 >A top-injection bottom-production cyclic steam stimulation method for enhanced heavy oil recovery
【2h】

A top-injection bottom-production cyclic steam stimulation method for enhanced heavy oil recovery

机译:一种提高稠油采收率的顶喷底产循环蒸汽增产方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A novel method to enhance oil production during cyclic steam injection has beendeveloped. In the Top-Injection and Bottom-Production (TINBOP) method, the wellcontains two strings separated by two packers (a dual and a single packer): the shortstring (SS) is completed in the top quarter of the reservoir, while the long string (LS) iscompleted in the bottom quarter of the reservoir. The method requires an initial warm-upstage where steam is injected into both strings for 21 days; then the LS is opened toproduction while the SS continues to inject steam for 14 days. After the initial warm-up,the following schedule is repeated: the LS is closed and steam is injected in the SS for 21days; then steam injection is stopped and the LS is opened to production for 180 days.There is no soak period.Simulations to compare the performance of the TINBOP method against that of aconventional cyclic steam injector (perforated across the whole reservoir) have beenmade. Three reservoir types were simulated using 2-D radial, black oil models: Hamaca(9????API), San Ardo (12????API) and the SPE fourth comparative solution project (14????API).For the first two types, a 20x1x20 10-acre model was used that incorporated typical rockand fluid properties for these fields. Simulation results indicate oil recovery after 10 years was 5.7-27% OIIP withTINBOP, that is 57-93% higher than conventional cyclic steam injection (3.3-14% OIIP).Steam-oil ratios were also decreased with TINBOP (0.8-3.1%) compared to conventional(1.2-5.3%), resulting from the improved reservoir heating efficiency.
机译:已经开发出一种在循环蒸汽注入过程中提高产油量的新方法。在顶部注入和底部生产(TINBOP)方法中,油井包含由两个封隔器(双封隔器和单个封隔器)分隔的两根管柱:短管柱(SS)在储层的上四分之一处完成,而长管柱在长储层中完成(LS)在储层底部四分之一处完成。该方法需要初步的预热阶段,在该阶段中将蒸汽注入两个管柱中,持续21天。然后LS投入生产,而SS继续注入蒸汽14天。初始预热后,重复以下时间表:关闭LS,将蒸汽注入SS中21天;然后停止蒸汽注入,并且LS投入生产180天。没有浸泡时间。已进行了模拟比较,以比较TINBOP方法与常规循环蒸汽注入器(贯穿整个储层)的性能。使用2-D径向黑油模型模拟了三种储层类型:Hamaca(9?API),San Ardo(12?API)和SPE第四比较解决方案项目(14 ??? API)。对于前两种类型,使用了20x1x20 10英亩的模型,其中包含了这些油田的典型岩石和流体特性。模拟结果表明,使用TINBOP的10年后的油采收率为5.7-27%OIIP,比常规的循环蒸汽注入(3.3-14%的OIIP)高57-93%;使用TINBOP的汽油比也降低了(0.8-3.1% )相比常规(1.2-5.3%),这归因于改进的储层加热效率。

著录项

  • 作者

    Matus Eric Robert;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2006
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en_US
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号