首页> 外文会议>Heat-air-moisture transport : Measurements and implications in buildings >Vapor Permeability Measurements: Impact of Cup Sealing, Edge Correction, Flow Direction, and Mean Relative Humidity
【24h】

Vapor Permeability Measurements: Impact of Cup Sealing, Edge Correction, Flow Direction, and Mean Relative Humidity

机译:蒸气渗透率测量:杯密封,边缘校正,流向和平均相对湿度的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Water vapor permeability is a basic hygrothermal characteristic of a porous material. At first sight, the cup test used for measuring the property looks simple. Conditions to be fulfilled, however, are that the vapor flow crosses the sample only, is one-dimensional, and that flow direction has no impact on the result. Flow through the sample only demands a perfectly vapor-tight edge-high seal between sample and cup. That condition was tested using different sealing solutions. The results learned that more precautions than expected were needed. If the flow is not one-dimensional, for example, because such perfect seal is only realizable for a sample larger than the cup mouth, an edge correction must be applied to the value measured. As far as direction is concerned, measurements on a couple of hygroscopic materials gave different vapor permeability results for inward and outward flows. Long-lasting sorption after a fast initial hygroscopic moisture uptake appeared to be the reason for that. Dry, wet, and very wet cup testing shows that vapor permeability of hygroscopic materials increases with relative humidity. Some attribute that effect to surface flow from higher to lower relative humidity in the adsorbed water layers once beyond 50 % relative humidity. If that hypothesis was correct, apparent vapor permeability of hygroscopic layers, in situations where partial water vapor pressure and relative humidity gradients oppose, should be much lower than that measured with a wet cup. During the cold season opposing gradients are present in assemblies with a hygroscopic layer at the outside, covered by a vapor retarding finish. Yet, hot box testing on that kind of assemblies did not revealrnvapor permeabilities lower than the wet cup value, although interstitial condensation between the hygroscopic and vapor retarding layer was a fact.
机译:水蒸气渗透性是多孔材料的基本湿热特性。乍看之下,用于测量性能的杯子测试看起来很简单。但是,要满足的条件是,蒸气流仅穿过样品,是一维的,并且流动方向对结果没有影响。通过样品的流动只需要在样品和杯之间形成完全气密的边缘高密封。使用不同的密封溶液测试了该条件。结果得知,需要采取比预期更多的预防措施。例如,如果流体不是一维的,则由于仅对于大于杯口的样品才能实现这种完美的密封,因此必须对测量值进行边缘校正。就方向而言,对几种吸湿性材料的测量得出了向内和向外流动的不同透湿性结果。最初快速吸湿后吸收水分的持久吸附似乎是其原因。干燥,湿润和非常湿润的杯子测试表明,吸湿性材料的蒸气渗透性随相对湿度而增加。一旦超过50%相对湿度,就会影响吸附水层中从较高到较低的相对湿度的表面流动。如果该假设是正确的,则在部分水蒸气压力和相对湿度梯度相反的情况下,吸湿层的表观蒸气渗透率应远低于用湿杯测量的渗透率。在寒冷季节,组件中会出现相反的梯度,在外部具有吸湿层,并被阻气层覆盖。然而,尽管吸湿层和阻气层之间的间隙凝结是事实,但对此类组件进行的热箱测试并未显示出低于湿杯值的蒸气渗透率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号