首页> 外文会议>Graphics Interface Proceedings; 20040517-19; London(CA) >Toolglasses, Marking Menus, and Hotkeys: A Comparison of One and Two-Handed Command Selection Techniques
【24h】

Toolglasses, Marking Menus, and Hotkeys: A Comparison of One and Two-Handed Command Selection Techniques

机译:工具玻璃,标记菜单和热键:一手和两只手命令选择技术的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper introduces a new input technique, bimanual marking menus, and compares its performance with five other techniques: static toolbars, hotkeys, grouped hotkeys, marking menus, and toolglasses. The study builds on previous work by setting the comparison in a commonly encountered task, shape drawing. In this context, grouped hotkeys and bimanual marking menus were found to be the fastest. Subjectively, the most preferred input method was bimanual marking menus. Toolglass performance was unexpectedly slow, which hints at the importance of low-level toolglass implementation choices.
机译:本文介绍了一种新的输入技术,即双向标记菜单,并将其性能与其他五种技术进行了比较:静态工具栏,热键,分组的热键,标记菜单和工具杯。通过在一个常见的任务(形状绘图)中设置比较,该研究以先前的工作为基础。在这种情况下,发现分组的热键和双向标记菜单是最快的。主观上,最优选的输入方法是双手标记菜单。工具玻璃的性能出乎意料地缓慢,这表明选择低级别工具玻璃的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号