【24h】

Non-regulatory Approaches to Development on Karst

机译:喀斯特发展的非管制方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

When attempting to regulate land use to protect groundwater quality and to prevent karst hazards, regulatory approaches most often form the focus of the efforts. For example, a zoning overlay for water supply protection may serve as the cornerstone for local source water protection programs. However, zoning and local ordinances fail to address many of the indirect effects of urbanization in karst regions. State statutes, limits on local authority and local political considerations often constrain the effectiveness of these regulatory approaches. Public outreach, voluntary incentives and non-regulatory approaches promise more effective control of land use and deleterious effects of uncontrolled growth in sensitive karst areas. For example, both conservation easements and nonpoint source control/agricultural assistance programs generally center on the improvement of riparian vegetation and open space protection. However, these tools prove just as effective in helping achieve the goals of source water protection and hazard mitigation in karst areas. Reorienting emergency response and training exercises towards these goals require only minimal adjustments to existing programs and promise cost effective results. This paper reviews proven non-regulatory tools including conservation easements, purchase of development rights programs, transfer of development rights programs, low impact development and conservation subdivision design. The authors then show examples of how some of these tools may be used to achieve source water protection and karst hazard mitigation goals. Finally, the paper suggests ways that local governments may achieve the level of communication and cooperation at the local and regional levels needed to successfully implement these non-regulatory tools. The authors conclude that in many settings these non-regulatory tools promise better results for less monetary and political cost than the more often used regulatory tools.
机译:当试图规范土地利用以保护地下水水质和防止岩溶危害时,通常采用管理方法作为工作重点。例如,用于水源保护的分区覆盖层可以用作当地水源水保护计划的基石。但是,分区和当地法令未能解决喀斯特地区城市化的许多间接影响。国家法规,对地方当局的限制以及地方政治考虑因素常常限制了这些监管方法的有效性。公众宣传,自愿性激励措施和非管制措施有望在敏感的喀斯特地区更加有效地控制土地利用和不受控制的增长所带来的有害影响。例如,保护地役权和非点源控制/农业援助计划通常都以改善河岸植被和开放空间保护为中心。但是,这些工具被证明在帮助实现喀斯特地区的水源保护和减灾目标方面同样有效。重新调整应急响应和培训目标以实现这些目标,只需要对现有计划进行最小的调整,并保证具有成本效益的结果。本文回顾了久经考验的非监管工具,包括保护地役权,购买开发权计划,转让开发权计划,低影响开发和保护分区设计。然后作者展示了如何使用其中一些工具来实现水源保护和减轻喀斯特灾害的目标的示例。最后,本文提出了一些方法,使地方政府可以达到成功实施这些非监管工具所需的地方和地区层面的沟通与合作水平。作者得出的结论是,在许多情况下,与更常用的监管工具相比,这些非监管工具有望以更少的货币和政治成本带来更好的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号